Bank foreclosed on primary residence of taxpayer in October of 2012. Taxpayer said house went on auction in December of 2012 but taxpayer received no 1099-A. Loan was a non-recourse loan so there should not be a 1099-C. My question is being taxpayer did not receive a 1099-A, should I still report the non-deductible loss of sale of residence on schedule D in 2012? I am wondering if the process carried over to 2013 and taxpayer might receive the 1099-A in 2013.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Foreclosure with no 1099-A
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Snaggletooth View PostIt is sometimes unfortunate, but there actually is NO debt forgiveness until the lender writes the account off their books.
In 2011 a client received a 1099-A for a foreclosure that occurred early in 2009.
So your client may yet receive a 1099 in 2013 or even 2014.
And if it really was a 1099-A and not a 1099-C, then the lender in your case was in error. The 1099-A is all about the imputed sale, and is at most a warning about potential canceled debt. The only flexibility around the 1099-A is the option to roll it into the 1099-C if it's the same year. Otherwise, they're required to issue the 1099-A as soon as the foreclosure is final, even if they plan on taking several years attempting to collect the balance before canceling it.
In other words, it's potentially valid for a foreclosure in 2009 to result in a 1099-C in 2011, or 2012, or later. But it's not valid for a foreclosure in 2009 to result in a 1099-A in 2011 - unless there were legal proceedings interfering the with foreclosure.
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment