Originally posted by GTS1101
View Post
It's difficult to comment without see exactly what was written but certainly the WHOLE POINT of a C230 practitioner accepting a POA from a taxpayer is,in fact, to serve as an advocate for the taxpyer. Advocating for a taxpayer does not suggest espousing incorrect or flawed positions on a tax return but it does suggest vigorous support for a taxpayer's position when there is authority for that position. Perhaps, there is some confusion with filing a Form 8821 which allows for an interchange of information with the IRS but specifically does NOT allow the holder of the 8821 to advocate on behalf of the taxpayer. (I might add that the IRS has sometimes slipped on this in the past).
The regulation you cite §601.504 only describes the requirements for filing a POA and certainly does not prohibit the holder of the POA from advocating for the taxpayer.
To your second question - §10.21 of C230 really addresses situations where a practitioner has been retained by a taxpayer for a representation matter. IMO, it contemplates situations after a tax return has been filed and not in the situation you describe.
Certainly, in the situation you write about, you would be subject to any number of sanctions, whether you are a C230 practitioner or not, for submitting a false return. You sign a tax return under the jurat printed on the return and in the least subject yourself to a minimum preparer penalty of $1,000 under §6694 for an understatement of tax on the return.
Comment