I have a client who works for a major airline -W2 earnings are usually right at about $150,000. He does not have a retirement plan nor does he currently contribute to company 401k as they do not offer any match.
His wife has an S corporation which has sporadic profits. She does not currently draw a wage and income streams are very irregular. The S corporation has no employees.
Could she set up a 401k within the S corporation and pay herself a low salary say 15K and defer it all or most of it? or better yet pay him a wage (he does participate in the business) and defer it all? The advantage to paying him is he is already maxed out through his regular job on SS wages and would receive his SS contribution back.
I'm thinking if the deferral was made, then the S corp would have net a deduction of 15K (the wages paid), which would flow through to the taxpayer's 1040. The taxpayers would not have any additional income as they would have deffered the whole wage.
What are the holes in this scenario -there must be some! Is there any problem with this if the corporation is not profitable?
Thanks
Carolyn
His wife has an S corporation which has sporadic profits. She does not currently draw a wage and income streams are very irregular. The S corporation has no employees.
Could she set up a 401k within the S corporation and pay herself a low salary say 15K and defer it all or most of it? or better yet pay him a wage (he does participate in the business) and defer it all? The advantage to paying him is he is already maxed out through his regular job on SS wages and would receive his SS contribution back.
I'm thinking if the deferral was made, then the S corp would have net a deduction of 15K (the wages paid), which would flow through to the taxpayer's 1040. The taxpayers would not have any additional income as they would have deffered the whole wage.
What are the holes in this scenario -there must be some! Is there any problem with this if the corporation is not profitable?
Thanks
Carolyn
Comment