Was tryin' to think of what they call that day traders' dodge to beat the $3K capital gain barrier -- Marky Mark? No... / to Market, to Market to buy a fat...contract? No, no.../ the Mark of Cain't (stay out of the market)? No.../ Maker's Mark (that's pretty good stuff)? No...no...
And now the mail brings me a Mark-To-Market article about how the Tax Court killed off a taxpayer's claimed $200K stock-trading all-in-one-year ordinary loss and $100K of business expenses.
My interest is that 15 years ago my businessman client lost $100K (broker churned him) in the stock market. Equipment sales used up half; I've been writing off $3K annually since and, while it's a nice yearly tidbit, I've since thought I could have elected MM and made a killin' for him.
Turns out, it's a high bar to get over. TC said no fixed line makes you a trader; it depends on intent, nature of income, and trading regularity/extent/frequency. While I felt my guy's broker traded excessively (two-three trades every day), TC doesn't think that's much at all They said incorporating showed intent to become a trader, but "trading activities were not substantial" (first year-289 trades/63 days -- second year-372 trades-110 days) and were not timed for daily market swings. Many stocks were long-term investments "held over 31 days" (that's a new definition of long-term to me). They concluded he failed to establish trader status, could not make the MM election, ordinary losses were converted back to capital losses, and his fully deductible 1120 business expenses became "A" investment expenses.
Tough break for that guy and I guess mine didn't miss anything after all. Markin' it up to experience.
P.S. I don't know if having a broker execute orders (which my guy did) rather than doing it directly would disqualify you or not. At one time I traded stocks and commodities quite a bit, but always went through a broker (Scottrade, etc. weren't around at the time).
And now the mail brings me a Mark-To-Market article about how the Tax Court killed off a taxpayer's claimed $200K stock-trading all-in-one-year ordinary loss and $100K of business expenses.
My interest is that 15 years ago my businessman client lost $100K (broker churned him) in the stock market. Equipment sales used up half; I've been writing off $3K annually since and, while it's a nice yearly tidbit, I've since thought I could have elected MM and made a killin' for him.
Turns out, it's a high bar to get over. TC said no fixed line makes you a trader; it depends on intent, nature of income, and trading regularity/extent/frequency. While I felt my guy's broker traded excessively (two-three trades every day), TC doesn't think that's much at all They said incorporating showed intent to become a trader, but "trading activities were not substantial" (first year-289 trades/63 days -- second year-372 trades-110 days) and were not timed for daily market swings. Many stocks were long-term investments "held over 31 days" (that's a new definition of long-term to me). They concluded he failed to establish trader status, could not make the MM election, ordinary losses were converted back to capital losses, and his fully deductible 1120 business expenses became "A" investment expenses.
Tough break for that guy and I guess mine didn't miss anything after all. Markin' it up to experience.
P.S. I don't know if having a broker execute orders (which my guy did) rather than doing it directly would disqualify you or not. At one time I traded stocks and commodities quite a bit, but always went through a broker (Scottrade, etc. weren't around at the time).
Comment