Client received 2005 and 2006 books and taxes in previous years. In the books are a complete print out of the GL, etc.
We were getting ready to do 2007 when this year my client carefully goes over all their assets. I always ask them to review, but apparently reviewing was not as good as going over them line by line at home with their records in front of them.
I then learn of many errors. One big one was we counted $60k of income in 2005 instead of a sale of an asset. And the depreciation was on for the full year in 05 and also on 06. In 2006 there were about 4 or 5 other big changes and several small ones.
Well, we will amend but my question: Should I do adjusting entries dated 12/31/05 and 12/31/06? Is it enough to then just give them a sheet to put with their books?
We were getting ready to do 2007 when this year my client carefully goes over all their assets. I always ask them to review, but apparently reviewing was not as good as going over them line by line at home with their records in front of them.
I then learn of many errors. One big one was we counted $60k of income in 2005 instead of a sale of an asset. And the depreciation was on for the full year in 05 and also on 06. In 2006 there were about 4 or 5 other big changes and several small ones.
Well, we will amend but my question: Should I do adjusting entries dated 12/31/05 and 12/31/06? Is it enough to then just give them a sheet to put with their books?
Comment