Can a NOL carryover be used to offset the cancellation of debt and gain from the repossession of a rental home?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Repossession of Rental Homes
Collapse
X
-
Nol
I can't think of any reason why it couldn't be used to offset such a gain...
Just to clarify this--
Is your client a party that lost ownership of a rental property in a foreclosure?
Or is your client a party that repossessed a property after the buyer defaulted?
Your post makes it sound like your client lost an investment property in a foreclosure proceeding.
But I've seen cases where the the owner of a rental property sells it to someone on a land contract, or a seller-financed mortgage, and then takes the property back when they can't make the payments. This can sometimes result in a gain for the party who actually repossesses the property.
I've heard of cases where an owner has "sold" the same property three or four times.
[LMAOBurton M. Koss
koss@usakoss.net
____________________________________
The map is not the territory...
and the instruction book is not the process.
-
Yes, the party is the one who has lost ownership of multiple rental homes this year in foreclosures. He has a large loss carryover. He will have forgiven debt for each property due to property value decline below his mortgage balances. He may also have gains on the distributions after depreciation is applied to basis. Any help on this is greatly appreciated.
Originally posted by Koss View PostI can't think of any reason why it couldn't be used to offset such a gain...
Just to clarify this--
Is your client a party that lost ownership of a rental property in a foreclosure?
Or is your client a party that repossessed a property after the buyer defaulted?
Your post makes it sound like your client lost an investment property in a foreclosure proceeding.
But I've seen cases where the the owner of a rental property sells it to someone on a land contract, or a seller-financed mortgage, and then takes the property back when they can't make the payments. This can sometimes result in a gain for the party who actually repossesses the property.
I've heard of cases where an owner has "sold" the same property three or four times.
[LMAO
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment