Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Age 70 1/2 Part 2

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Age 70 1/2 Part 2

    I cannot believe S T has the similar question I came here to ask about RMD. My taxpayer turned 70 in September last year. 70 1/2 would have been in March-according to what I read, he should have made a RMD by April 1, or am I reading that incorrectly? Will he be ok if he makes a withdrawal by the end of the year or will the few days make him eligible for a 50% penalty? Please say it's not so.

    I am surprised he didn't receive something in the mail from the Trustee of his IRA. I called to inquire about it (he hasn't come in yet to get his taxes done), and he says he has nothing. Can Roland or someone else who has a better grasp of this subject tell me what I need to do to help him? I appreciate the comments.

    Peachie

    #2
    recheck your research

    your client has to take his rmd by april 1 of the year AFTER he turns 70 1/2.

    so, if he turns 70 1/2 this april 1, he has 12 months to take his rmd -- that is probably why his ira trustee has not said anything yet (letter is in the mail).
    Just because I look dumb does not mean I am not.

    Comment


      #3
      I've run into the same

      problem. Several clients have their funds at Wachovia Securities. It appears that Wachovia does not send out "reminders" to take the RMD. A couple of my clients almost messed up if it hadn't been for their astuteness. I have taken to putting "notes" in the client folder to remind me to tell them when they are close to 70-1/2. (that is at my age IF I can remember)

      Comment


        #4
        Lots of hugs Travis

        Originally posted by travis bickle View Post
        your client has to take his rmd by april 1 of the year AFTER he turns 70 1/2. .
        That word AFTER is huge. I missed that. Thank you so much. This makes my day.

        Peachie

        Comment


          #5
          But I think he'll have to double up in 2009 so if that would hurt tax-wise have him withdraw in 2008.
          JG

          Comment


            #6
            I suggested that he

            Originally posted by JG EA View Post
            But I think he'll have to double up in 2009 so if that would hurt tax-wise have him withdraw in 2008.
            makes his first withdrawal this year JG for the very reason you mentioned. Since he's still employed, it will make a difference.

            Thanks.

            Peachie

            Comment


              #7
              Rmd's

              Vanguard also did not take RMD's for several years for one of my clients. I am doing Form 5329 for those years after the 15th of the month. These custodians have to be watched.

              Comment


                #8
                The trustee

                Originally posted by Larry M View Post
                problem. Several clients have their funds at Wachovia Securities. It appears that Wachovia does not send out "reminders" to take the RMD. A couple of my clients almost messed up if it hadn't been for their astuteness. I have taken to putting "notes" in the client folder to remind me to tell them when they are close to 70-1/2. (that is at my age IF I can remember)
                MUST remind them. It's the law.
                ChEAr$,
                Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

                Comment

                Working...
                X