Land taxes for royalty land

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gretel
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2005
    • 4008

    #1

    Land taxes for royalty land

    Taxes paid for land from which royalty income is received are deductible on Sch. E or Sch. A?
  • thomtax
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2006
    • 1276

    #2
    Gabrielle, Isn't there a line on the Schedule E, where royalty payments are accounted for, that lists taxes?
    Only in government or politics is a "cut in spending" really an increase. It's just not as much of an increase as they wanted it to be, therefore a "cut".

    Comment

    • Gretel
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2005
      • 4008

      #3
      Originally posted by thomtax
      Gabrielle, Isn't there a line on the Schedule E, where royalty payments are accounted for, that lists taxes?
      Oh, yes it is. I have been using this line for production taxes, which are deducted by the royalty companies automatically. I have been using the land taxes on Sch. A but now doubt that this is the correct treatment. Doesn't make any difference if they itemize but will if not.

      Comment

      • gkaiseril
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2007
        • 567

        #4
        State Issue

        This could have an affect on the state income tax. Since a Schedule E deduction is above the AGI line it would affect all the states that start at the federal AGI and do not take into account the Schedule A items.

        Comment

        • Gretel
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2005
          • 4008

          #5
          Thanks for pointing out the state issue. However, in Montana the state is effected the same way as Federal, just at a different income level.

          Anyone else a suggestion if these taxes should go on Sch. A or E?

          Comment

          • taxxcpa
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2007
            • 978

            #6
            Tax on land

            If the land is used for anything other than as a location for the wells, then it could not all be considered an expense of the royalty. I don't really know the answer, but there might be some sort of allocation between the mineral interest in the property and the remaining interest in the property.

            Comment

            Working...