I posted the question years ago, and afraid that I got the wrong answer.
Taxpayers have a house.(A) In 2003 they refinanced this house and took out $100,000 to acquire another house. (B)
House A – original mortgage 200,000 and 300,000 after refinancing.
House B - $100,000 used for down payment. Mortgage balance $400,000.
In November 2003, taxpayers convert house A into Rental and move in house B (which becomes their primary residence.
Tracing rules require allocating the interest to the residence.
I was told before to allocate 34 % of the mortgage interest from property A to property B (Schedule A) that I did.
Does anyone see something wrong with that?
Taxpayers have a house.(A) In 2003 they refinanced this house and took out $100,000 to acquire another house. (B)
House A – original mortgage 200,000 and 300,000 after refinancing.
House B - $100,000 used for down payment. Mortgage balance $400,000.
In November 2003, taxpayers convert house A into Rental and move in house B (which becomes their primary residence.
Tracing rules require allocating the interest to the residence.
I was told before to allocate 34 % of the mortgage interest from property A to property B (Schedule A) that I did.
Does anyone see something wrong with that?
Comment