Seriously, violins. Does anyone know - or know where I could find - information on the depreciable life of a concert violin? The standard references have come up dry. I seem to recall a tax court case, in the 90's, where a TP attempted to depreciate his concert Stradivarius - a work instrument; IRS said, 'No - because a Strad can only APpreciate'. Court found for the TP.Any help would be APpreciated!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Violins
Collapse
X
-
Appreciation/Depreciation
Anything you can write off deserves de-'preciation of de client.
Ridiculous. I don't know about your court case as to whether that
actually happened or not, but a building appreciates in value, yet
you are allowed to depreciate it.
I would depreciate a musical instrument over 7 years. As a concert
performer myself (in another life) I can attest to the fact that a musician's
actual use of a Stratovarious as a standard performance item would be
extremely foolhardy and remote. That probably had more to do with a
tax court decision than its depreciableworthiness.
Part of the depreciation "mentality" when these laws
were written has little to do with actual loss in value. More to do with
how quickly the investment in equipment can be recovered.
Those who doubt can look at the acrostic for ACRS and MACRS -
"Accelerated Cost Recovery System" and "Modified ACRS" The
depreciable nature is to partially compensate the investor for not
being able to write off his investment in the year the money was
spent.
-
I remember the case
Originally posted by bertrans View PostSeriously, violins. Does anyone know - or know where I could find - information on the depreciable life of a concert violin? The standard references have come up dry. I seem to recall a tax court case, in the 90's, where a TP attempted to depreciate his concert Stradivarius - a work instrument; IRS said, 'No - because a Strad can only APpreciate'. Court found for the TP.Any help would be APpreciated!
So go ahead and depreciate; you're on firm ground here.ChEAr$,
Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nashville View PostAnything you can write off deserves de-'preciation of de client.
Part of the depreciation "mentality" when these laws
were written has little to do with actual loss in value. More to do with
how quickly the investment in equipment can be recovered.
Those who doubt can look at the acrostic for ACRS and MACRS -
"Accelerated Cost Recovery System" and "Modified ACRS" The
depreciable nature is to partially compensate the investor for not
being able to write off his investment in the year the money was
spent.
Before ACRS, salvage value had to be deducted. Years ago if you traded cars every two years, you had to use two years and straight line and a salvage value. But if you traded every three years you could use double declining balance--which would never fully recover the cost, but would give some big first-year depreciation.
Comment
-
In her business my wife
has 2 Steinway grand pianos. I depreciated them over 7 years. They have appreciated in value over the past 20 years and are now so expensive I can hardly believe it. I also have a client that is a violn playing member in the local symphony. 7 years depreciation.
Now this is just what I've done.
Larry
Comment
-
Originally posted by ED SMITH View PostIt is neither - it is correctly Stradivari, after its maker Antonio Stradivari - or more commonly Stradivarius.
It is a pleasure to see such concern for language!! Thanks!
Comment
-
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment