Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tax Professionals' Own Returns

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Tax Professionals' Own Returns

    Is there any sense that the IRS is any harder on our own personal and business returns than on the ones we prepare for clients or the ones people prepare themselves? What raises the question for me is a tax court case reported in NATP Tax Pro Monthly for Feb 08 on page 5. The taxpayer is a CPA. (The article doesn't say how much if any of his business is related to taxes but he would be an unusual CPA if he does not do a lot of tax work.) He had 23K profit as a CPA on Schedule C and his wife had approximately $43K of wages. He also filed a Sch C for himself as a professional gambler, on which 83K of winnings was zeroed out by 83K of losses. The IRS and ultimately the Tax Court held that his investment of time and his recordkeeping indicated that gambling was a hobby not a business for him. He therefore had AGI that cost him the Child Tax Credit and caused his itemized deductions to be limited. The article is silent on the question I most want answered. Did he pay a heavier penalty for his actions than he would have paid had he been an amateur who either did his own return or paid a professional to do it? (For purposes of this discussion let's ignore the possibility that his professional would have reimbursed him in some way or even had to give him more than he lost.)
    Last edited by erchess; 02-12-2008, 02:50 PM.

    #2
    Tax Professionals' Own Returns

    your question has not been my experience...the CPA was not audited because he is a CPA, he was audited because of how he prepared his return. taxea
    Believe nothing you have not personally researched and verified.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by taxea View Post
      your question has not been my experience...the CPA was not audited because he is a CPA, he was audited because of how he prepared his return. taxea
      Agreed. The only area in which the TP's profession as a CPA may have made some difference would be in the assertion of the Accuracy-related penalty [negligence penalty]: the IRS would have argued that his professional background (IF it involved taxes) created a higher bar.

      Comment


        #4
        It also sounds as if his gambling is what did him in, along with trying to get ahead of the game by the way he filed it.

        LT
        Only in government or politics is a "cut in spending" really an increase. It's just not as much of an increase as they wanted it to be, therefore a "cut".

        Comment

        Working...
        X