We've had lots of discussion about what type of proof and/or client statements we might be comfortable with for mileage, contributions, and other related items for the upcoming year. But what about gambling losses?
It seems almost everyone loses as much as or more than they won, and they get to offset the losses up the amount of winnings on Schedule A, but what level of proof do you feel comfortable with?
For several years I've had them sign a separate statement for gambling losses, but I'm beginnig to wonder if I need to ask them to show me logs or other documentation, or is their signed statement enough? Common sense tells me that most people who win $2K, $5K, $10K, etc at the slots are probably cycling that much or more back in, but at what point do we begin asking questions or requesting more. Is anyone planning to require more proof on this type of deduction for 2007 returns?
It seems almost everyone loses as much as or more than they won, and they get to offset the losses up the amount of winnings on Schedule A, but what level of proof do you feel comfortable with?
For several years I've had them sign a separate statement for gambling losses, but I'm beginnig to wonder if I need to ask them to show me logs or other documentation, or is their signed statement enough? Common sense tells me that most people who win $2K, $5K, $10K, etc at the slots are probably cycling that much or more back in, but at what point do we begin asking questions or requesting more. Is anyone planning to require more proof on this type of deduction for 2007 returns?
Comment