Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MRD too small in 2006

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    MRD too small in 2006

    In computing the minimum required distributions from IRA for 2006, one IRA was omitted in determining the combined fair market value at 12/31/05. We just discovered the omission now. A MRD of $6000 was made. The correct MRD amount including all accounts should have been $6800.

    Do we need to take an additional $800 out in 2007 to compensate? I know we have a potential penalty on this, but not sure if we want to proactively address this or wait until we get a notice. Thought?
    Last edited by KJ Judd; 12-26-2007, 02:21 PM. Reason: correct amounts

    #2
    Originally posted by KJ Judd View Post
    In computing the minimum required distributions from IRA for 2006, one IRA was omitted in determining the combined fair market value at 12/31/05. We just discovered the omission now. A MRD of $6000 was made. The correct MRD amount including all accounts should have been $6800.

    Do we need to take an additional $800 out in 2007 to compensate? I know we have a potential penalty on this, but not sure if we want to proactively address this or wait until we get a notice. Thought?
    KJ have client take out the 2006 RMD additional amount now, as well as make sure that the 2007 is satisfied. Then when amend 2006 year tax return. Attach a form 5329 penalty to the $800 missed Rmd which should be $400. If the client has reasonable cause for missing the RMD attach a letter to the 5329 asking for abatement of the penalty and do not enclose the $400. SEE TTB page 13-25 for 2006

    Comment

    Working...
    X