Let's say a mother drives around her 5 year old daughter, who is a clothes model, and also has other expenses such as specialty clothing, photo portfolio expenses, etc.
Since the mileage is really the mother's expense, should the mother have the child reimburse the mother for actual expenses to get her to each photo shoot, or any other business location?
Or should the child pay her mother a manager's fee and then the mother can deduct her mileage?
Don't see this very often; usually the child is old enough to drive if they are working!
I read this from Kleinrock's Tax Expert:
To obtain the benefits of income-splitting, the arrangement must be
structured so that the child (or other family member) has some control
over the income earned -- a parent who is responsible for a child's
earnings and retains total control over the earnings may be required to
include those earnings in the his or her own gross income. 4 If this
requirement is met, the compensation paid to the child is taxed to the
child, whether or not the child actually receives it and regardless of
state law provisions relating to who is entitled to it. The code section is 61.
I don't see how a 5 year old can have much control over its income. Maybe this rule can also be avoided if the parent sets up an IRA for the child and contribute most of the earnings.
TIA
Since the mileage is really the mother's expense, should the mother have the child reimburse the mother for actual expenses to get her to each photo shoot, or any other business location?
Or should the child pay her mother a manager's fee and then the mother can deduct her mileage?
Don't see this very often; usually the child is old enough to drive if they are working!
I read this from Kleinrock's Tax Expert:
To obtain the benefits of income-splitting, the arrangement must be
structured so that the child (or other family member) has some control
over the income earned -- a parent who is responsible for a child's
earnings and retains total control over the earnings may be required to
include those earnings in the his or her own gross income. 4 If this
requirement is met, the compensation paid to the child is taxed to the
child, whether or not the child actually receives it and regardless of
state law provisions relating to who is entitled to it. The code section is 61.
I don't see how a 5 year old can have much control over its income. Maybe this rule can also be avoided if the parent sets up an IRA for the child and contribute most of the earnings.
TIA
Comment