Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The expenditures should be capitalized?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    The expenditures should be capitalized?

    We are a nonprofit real estate developer. We received $5,000,000 orphan site cleanup assessment grant from State of California. In 2006, we spent $3,800,000 on groundwater monitoring, feasibility testing and environmental assessment.

    The expenditures in the amount of $3,800,000 should be capitalized?

    #2
    Let me understand

    you got 5 million and you don't have an accountant lined up to take care of the paperwork?

    Comment


      #3
      Grant

      Geez,,,,,only in America,,,and California of all places.....the state is broke
      Last edited by RLymanC; 09-20-2007, 01:30 AM.
      Confucius say:
      He who sits on tack is better off.

      Comment


        #4
        Maybe NPH IS the accountant!

        Comment


          #5
          Maybe

          Maybe is NPH the "in house accountant"

          Maybe this operation needs a professional to assist, although the posts have presented some issues that all of us might have learned from.

          Sandy

          Comment


            #6
            TTB, page 8-7 says:

            Environmental clean-up costs. These costs are generally capital
            expenditures. However, for qualified environmental cleanup
            costs paid before January 1, 2008, a taxpayer can choose to deduct
            these costs as a current business expense. Qualified environmental
            cleanup costs are expenses paid to abate or control hazardous
            substances at a qualified contaminated site. See IRS Pub. 535 for
            further details.

            The link to Pub 535 from the WebCD takes you to page 28 and gives you a column and a half of information on what is considered qualified environmental cleanup costs. I don't know if your monitoring and assessment expenses would fall into that category, but that would be the place I would start in researching this issue.

            Comment


              #7
              Thanks.

              Yes, we have hired accountants and auditors, but sometimes I doubt the accountants and auditors are correct.

              Total clearup cost of the orphan sites is $3,800,000.

              Total value of the sites (land) which our company owns is $1,200,000

              $3,800,000 was capitalized by auditors in 2006.

              Now our assets in the book are hugh, but real assets are about 3 times smaller.
              Last edited by NPH; 09-20-2007, 11:34 AM.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Bees Knees View Post
                TTB, page 8-7 says:

                Environmental clean-up costs. These costs are generally capital
                expenditures. However, for qualified environmental cleanup
                costs paid before January 1, 2008, a taxpayer can choose to deduct
                these costs as a current business expense. Qualified environmental
                cleanup costs are expenses paid to abate or control hazardous
                substances at a qualified contaminated site. See IRS Pub. 535 for
                further details.

                The link to Pub 535 from the WebCD takes you to page 28 and gives you a column and a half of information on what is considered qualified environmental cleanup costs. I don't know if your monitoring and assessment expenses would fall into that category, but that would be the place I would start in researching this issue.
                thanks. I will research later.

                Comment

                Working...
                X