Why not wait?
If you reach 66 and are still able to earn a living, why not continue to work and wait longer to being drawing SS, unless you are independently wealthy? The benefit increase between 66 and 70 is about 8% per year, which you'll continue receive the rest of your life (with cost of living increases). As a matter of fact, if you assume a monthly benefit of $2,000 at full retirement, each year you wait past age 66 is roughly the equivalent of putting $24K annually into an IRA and then buying an annuity with the accumulated funds. I'm painting with a broad brush here, but I'll bet if you run the numbers you'll find the analogy relevant. If an IRA (or an IRA equivalent) is a good idea at age 40, it's also a good idea at age 66 unless you've already achieved critical mass.
As I said before, your primary risk is outliving your assets and your buying power. I'm not persuaded by the argument that it's important to leave anything to one's heirs, nor the argument about becoming incapacitated. First and foremost is the consideration to remain financially secure and to avoid becomeing a financial burden to one's heirs or to the taxpayers, if possible.
If you reach 66 and are still able to earn a living, why not continue to work and wait longer to being drawing SS, unless you are independently wealthy? The benefit increase between 66 and 70 is about 8% per year, which you'll continue receive the rest of your life (with cost of living increases). As a matter of fact, if you assume a monthly benefit of $2,000 at full retirement, each year you wait past age 66 is roughly the equivalent of putting $24K annually into an IRA and then buying an annuity with the accumulated funds. I'm painting with a broad brush here, but I'll bet if you run the numbers you'll find the analogy relevant. If an IRA (or an IRA equivalent) is a good idea at age 40, it's also a good idea at age 66 unless you've already achieved critical mass.
As I said before, your primary risk is outliving your assets and your buying power. I'm not persuaded by the argument that it's important to leave anything to one's heirs, nor the argument about becoming incapacitated. First and foremost is the consideration to remain financially secure and to avoid becomeing a financial burden to one's heirs or to the taxpayers, if possible.
Comment