I think there was a recent thread on this, but cannot find using search feature.
Employee drives large amount of miles each year. The employer pays for gas and issued a 1099 Misc showing the amount reimbursed in box 7. Which of the following options would be correct, if any?
1. Enter 1099misc on line 21 of 1040 with the standard mileage expense entered on form 2106.
2. Enter the amount in box 7 of 1099 Misc as employer reimbursed expenses not reported on W2 into line 7 of Form 2106 and the standard mileage expense on form 2106. I assume that I would have to enter the 1099Misc amount as a plus on line 21 with a second minus entry showing the amount transferred to 2106 to keep the IRS from looking for a matching 1099.
3. Since it is reported in box 7 of 1099 Misc, could this be shown on Schedule C with the standard mileage deduction on schedule c. The mileage deduction will be much larger than the income so SE tax will not be an issue. This does not seem the correct way to go but want to know if there is some quirk that will allow this approach.
Thanks for all opinions.
LT
Employee drives large amount of miles each year. The employer pays for gas and issued a 1099 Misc showing the amount reimbursed in box 7. Which of the following options would be correct, if any?
1. Enter 1099misc on line 21 of 1040 with the standard mileage expense entered on form 2106.
2. Enter the amount in box 7 of 1099 Misc as employer reimbursed expenses not reported on W2 into line 7 of Form 2106 and the standard mileage expense on form 2106. I assume that I would have to enter the 1099Misc amount as a plus on line 21 with a second minus entry showing the amount transferred to 2106 to keep the IRS from looking for a matching 1099.
3. Since it is reported in box 7 of 1099 Misc, could this be shown on Schedule C with the standard mileage deduction on schedule c. The mileage deduction will be much larger than the income so SE tax will not be an issue. This does not seem the correct way to go but want to know if there is some quirk that will allow this approach.
Thanks for all opinions.
LT
Comment