Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Charles

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Charles

    Re: Class action settlement Allapattah versus Exxon.

    Client actually received 99M in settlement. Got a 1099-INT for 52m and a lot of gobblygook from the law firm. I think only the 1099 amount is taxable due to the class action nature of the lawsuit..

    Please give me your opinion.

    Thanks,

    Charles Ray, the Texas Hammer

    #2
    Originally posted by charlesray View Post
    Re: Class action settlement Allapattah versus Exxon.

    Client actually received 99M in settlement. Got a 1099-INT for 52m and a lot of gobblygook from the law firm. I think only the 1099 amount is taxable due to the class action nature of the lawsuit..

    Please give me your opinion.

    Thanks,

    Charles Ray, the Texas Hammer
    The "class action nature" of the lawsuit has no bearing on whether or not it's taxable.

    Comment


      #3
      Why a 1099INT?

      Was it interest paid on the settlement amount? I would think a 1099MISC would have been issued first. Why was the settlement paid? That answer will determine what is taxable.
      In other words, a democratic government is the only one in which those who vote for a tax can escape the obligation to pay it.
      Alexis de Tocqueville

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Davc View Post
        The "class action nature" of the lawsuit has no bearing on whether or not it's taxable.
        TTB, pg 3-20: Class Action settlements for consumer goods or services as NOT taxable income unless deducted in an earlier year. The amount on the 1099INT may be the interest accrued during time up to disbursement of the funds.
        "A man that holds a cat by the tail learns something he can learn no other way." - Mark Twain

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by taxmandan View Post
          TTB, pg 3-20: Class Action settlements for consumer goods or services as NOT taxable income unless deducted in an earlier year.
          Not all class action settlements are for consumer goods or services. TTB is talking about you buy a toaster for $15. Somebody sues because of an electrical fire. The judge brings everyone and anyone who ever bought that toaster into the case under a class action settlement. Your share of the settlement is 27 cents. The 27 cents is not taxable because it is considered like a rebate on the $15 purchase.

          Not all class action settlements are like the above example. You can't just assume it isn't taxable simply because it was a class action settlement.
          Last edited by Brad Imsdahl; 02-08-2007, 10:05 AM.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by charlesray View Post
            Client actually received 99M in settlement. Got a 1099-INT for 52m and a lot of gobblygook from the law firm.
            Just curious...what do you mean by 99M?

            99 million?

            99 thousand?

            9,900?

            990?

            or

            99 Millimeters?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by taxmandan View Post
              TTB, pg 3-20: Class Action settlements for consumer goods or services as NOT taxable income unless deducted in an earlier year. The amount on the 1099INT may be the interest accrued during time up to disbursement of the funds.
              However, the same would be true if it was a single consumer suing someone. The "class action" nature of the settlement is not what makes the difference. The examples on 3-20 need to be read in the context of the first sentence following Other Claims:

              Comment


                #8
                charles

                it is 99 thousand.

                Comment

                Working...
                X