Taxpayer's 10 year old child was diagnosed with ADD and child is receiving social security disability payments due to the disability. Would the SS income be considered to be "provided by the child" to determine dependency?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Support Test for Qualifying Child
Collapse
X
-
Support
Pub. 17, page 31, middle column:
Social security benefits. If a husband and wife each receive benefits that are paid by one check made out to both of them, half the total paid is considered to be for the support of each spouse, unless they can show otherwise.
If a child receives social security benefits and uses them toward his own support, the benefits are considered as provided by the child.
* * * * *
Although this paragraph appears in the section that describes the support test for Qualifying Relative, the section on the support test for Qualifying Child directs the reader to this section "to see what is or is not support." See Pub. 17, page 28, bottom of left hand column.
Burton M. KossBurton M. Koss
koss@usakoss.net
____________________________________
The map is not the territory...
and the instruction book is not the process.
Comment
-
Yes
Originally posted by New York Enrolled Agent View PostIs this really the case???????????
"Taxpayer's 10 year old child was diagnosed with ADD and child is receiving social security disability payments due to the disability."
The child is getting social security based on the child's disability at AGE 10? Can this be correct?
on certification by a "doctor" Social Security administration pays the checks.ChEAr$,
Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA
Comment
-
God Bless America!
Once I did an tax return for a russian immigrant. He was married and had a couple of children. Was a hard worker in the shipyards, a nasty job.
Did his tax return and his refund was several thousand because of the EITC. When I told him what the refund was he about fell out of the chair.
He said how?
I said welcome to America.Last edited by veritas; 02-05-2007, 09:11 PM.
Comment
-
Brad - I don't disagree with what you wrote but the poster mentions nothing about a retired and/or disabled parent.
"Taxpayer's 10 year old child was diagnosed with ADD and child is receiving social security disability payments due to the disability."
The clear implication (at least to me ) is that the child was collecting on their own account based on the child's disability. If the parent is collecting SS benefits, wouldn't the 10 year would be eligible for benefits whether or not he/she was disabled? The benefits would flow because of their age & not due to any special disability condition.
Comment
-
Disabled Child
The original post states that the 10-year old has ADD and is receiving "social security disability" benefits.
This is SSI, or supplemental security income.
It is indeed the same program that provides benefits to disabled adults. And it is indeed administered by Social Security.
The program uses a very different definition of disabled for children than the one used for adults. The child in question will be re-evaluated when he turns 18, and he may no longer be considered disabled at that point. He probably has to be re-evaluated annually anyway, but the criteria for receiving benefits changes when he becomes an adult.
Check out this link:
Yeah, it's pretty alice-in-wonderland, if you ask me. These kids on SSI have some real problems, but the more serious problem is usually that the parents can't handle it, and it just gets worse. These children become unmanageable. I know a little bit about ADD, and in its severe forms, it needs to be actively managed every hour that the child is awake. It isn't something where you can just take your kid to the doctor and get it fixed. Sometimes the parents are barely functional themselves, and they just don't understand that the meds and the one hour a week visit with a shrink are not a comprehensive treatment program.
So we throw money at the problem...
Burton M. KossBurton M. Koss
koss@usakoss.net
____________________________________
The map is not the territory...
and the instruction book is not the process.
Comment
-
Originally posted by New York Enrolled Agent View PostBrad - I don't disagree with what you wrote but the poster mentions nothing about a retired and/or disabled parent.
I was merely supplying one possible explanation as to why a 10 year old ADD kid would be receiving Social Security Disability. You are correct; if Mom or Dad are not already on Social Security, the kid could not qualify for Social Security Disability. SSI maybe, but not Social Security.
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment