s-corp one share holder health ins

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bjorn
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2005
    • 185

    #1

    s-corp one share holder health ins

    Is it true you need to have the insurance in the name of the corp? They say it is hard to get a sole member insuarnce policy in the corp name.

    What are the options on this one?

    Thanks.
  • sandysea
    Member
    • Jan 2007
    • 46

    #2
    My clients do not have the health insurance for the S/H in the corporation name but as an employee of the corp, my client takes the insurance deduction on the corporate books, takes the total as wages and then takes the credit on their 1040's.

    Yes, in a perfect world the corporation has the policy in it's name, but many times insurance companies will not write a policy for a sole s/h...so even though IRS indicates this, you could argue "substance over form doctrine" in this case and still be reasonably not audited.

    Comment

    • Brad Imsdahl
      Senior Member
      • May 2005
      • 623

      #3
      Many experts recommend that you set up a Section 105(b) health reimbursement arrangement (HRA). That way the S corporation reimburses the shareholder for all medical costs, including the shareholder's personal health policy premiums. The experts believe this should meet IRS requirements for the self-employed health insurance deduction rule.

      Comment

      • JoshinNC
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2006
        • 1180

        #4
        I don't have a problem getting single s/h insurance plans

        My clients who are single s/h plans (construction, medical, legal fields) have plans in the corp name. I've never even heard of this being a problem. BTW, I also sell health insurance.

        Comment

        • sandysea
          Member
          • Jan 2007
          • 46

          #5
          Look up Revenue Ruling 61-146

          This is from IRS about reimbursements for health insurance to S/H...

          Comment

          • dsi
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2005
            • 705

            #6
            Originally posted by JoshinNC
            My clients who are single s/h plans (construction, medical, legal fields) have plans in the corp name. I've never even heard of this being a problem. BTW, I also sell health insurance.
            I guess some in some states it is impossible to get health insurance for a corp that is owned by a single SH.
            Dave, EA

            Comment

            • oceanlovin'ea
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2005
              • 2682

              #7
              HRA required?

              I'm resurrecting an old post.

              Do you have to set up a Section 105(b) through a company that handles those? Or can you just write up a health reimbursement plan and put it in the corporation's minutes?

              They charge a lot of money and I can't see where it is worth the costs.

              Linda F

              Comment

              • Gretel
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2005
                • 4008

                #8
                The very same question is occupying my mind. So I will bring it back to the top of the posts.

                I would love to be able to set up a HRA myself but for nothing in the world would I risk to have this deduction thrown out because a t wasn't crossed.

                Comment

                • RJM
                  Member
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 72

                  #9
                  S 105 medical reimbursement plans

                  it has been several years now since a court case (think it was a court case, not a letter ruling), which allowed unwritten medical reimbursement plans. Still I always recommend that clients put it in writing. No... you don't need an attorney, just put a paragraph in the employee manual if there is one, otherwise just put it in a memo to employees. Section 105 benefits are in nearly all cases required to be non-discriminatory, so they must be applied equally to all employees (with some participation criteria allowed).

                  For the health insurance, a S106 insurance plan is better, because the benefit can be discriminatory among classes of employees. And the insurance can be in the employee's (or employee-owner's) name, and reimbursed OR paid directly by the business. Much case law and letter rulings in this area. -Bob

                  Comment

                  • oceanlovin'ea
                    Senior Member
                    • Jun 2005
                    • 2682

                    #10
                    Rjm

                    Can you tell us more about the S106 or tell us where we can find out more about it.

                    Linda F

                    Comment

                    • S T
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2005
                      • 5053

                      #11
                      More on s106

                      I would also be curious to find out more about S106 and the health insuance. Can you point us to some links or research material.

                      Sandy

                      Comment

                      • geekgirldany
                        Senior Member
                        • Jul 2005
                        • 2359

                        #12
                        I typed this into google:
                        section 106 discriminatory among classes of employees

                        Clicked on the link for the Tax Almanac website. Look at that. I didn't read all of it though. But they are discussing the same thing it appears.

                        Comment

                        • Gretel
                          Senior Member
                          • Jun 2005
                          • 4008

                          #13
                          Correct me if I am wrong. My understanding of the S-Corp. health insurance problem is that - if it is not possible to have policy in Corp. name - it has to be a Sec. 105 plan, available to all employees. So every employee gets to choose if the reimbursment is for insurance or medical expenses or both. Sec. 106 plan will not work for S-Corps.

                          Question remains: Is it advisable to have plan through a company, which offers these plans or is a self written plan OK.

                          Comment

                          • twoodscpa
                            Junior Member
                            • Aug 2017
                            • 2

                            #14
                            Shareholder can be reimbursed for premium. Then make the W2 treatment

                            Originally posted by Bjorn
                            Is it true you need to have the insurance in the name of the corp? They say it is hard to get a sole member insuarnce policy in the corp name.

                            What are the options on this one?

                            Thanks.
                            Specifically came up at seminar. Now, S Corp can reimburse the shareholder. The add to box 1 of his W2, but not boxes 3 and 5. Also show in box 14. On personal return it shows as income on line 1, a reduction of S Corp income, and self-employee health insurance deduction. In the company return show it as officer wages

                            Comment

                            Working...