I went over the taxes of this 65 year old woman who's in a very low tax bracket. She says she wants to convert 20,000 from traditional IRA to a Roth. Which would cause her to Federal liability to go up from 500 dollars to several thousand (many even up to 5,500, if I remember).
So I said to her, "Mom! I'm not convinced that that would be beneficial!"
Granted, my mom has eaten bran and other rabbit food all here life and she'll probably outlive me. She read some book where doing a similar plan helped someone (someone younger with minimal tax income). My first guess is 'no way Jose!' But maybe converting 3,000 instead of 20,000 might actually work?
Does anyone know where I might get some 'rule of thumbs guides' that could help me address this issue? Or do I have to project her income out over probable life expectancy and then compare that to the current value of the caused tax increase?
thanks for reading
So I said to her, "Mom! I'm not convinced that that would be beneficial!"
Granted, my mom has eaten bran and other rabbit food all here life and she'll probably outlive me. She read some book where doing a similar plan helped someone (someone younger with minimal tax income). My first guess is 'no way Jose!' But maybe converting 3,000 instead of 20,000 might actually work?
Does anyone know where I might get some 'rule of thumbs guides' that could help me address this issue? Or do I have to project her income out over probable life expectancy and then compare that to the current value of the caused tax increase?
thanks for reading
Comment