Christmas Meal redux(again)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • veritas
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2005
    • 3290

    #1

    Christmas Meal redux(again)

    I hope I get this right
    28
    Is it deductible?
    10.71%
    3
    Is it 50% deductible?
    7.14%
    2
    Is it 70% deductible?
    0.00%
    0
    Is it 100% deductible?
    82.14%
    23
  • veritas
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2005
    • 3290

    #2
    I think I got it. Thanks for the help!

    Comment

    • veritas
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2005
      • 3290

      #3
      Most got it right.

      I was questioned on audit about this deduction. After the auditor did some checking she agreed it was 100% deductible.

      We also deduct annual company picnic 100%.

      Comment

      • Joe Btfsplk
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2005
        • 527

        #4
        Deducting meals

        I am self-employed and work at home, so I should be able to deduct 100% of the meals since they are provided for the convenience of my employer.

        I once had a client who had some accountant who told him to deduct all of his housing and food on that basis. The IRS never audited him.

        Comment

        • OldJack
          Banned
          • Dec 2005
          • 1689

          #5
          Originally posted by Joe Btfsplk
          I am self-employed and work at home, so I should be able to deduct 100% of the meals since they are provided for the convenience of my employer.
          The same concept allows one to deduct 100% of their mortgage payment, 100% of their auto payment, and 100% of my girl friends apartment payment (among other things, she is also for my convenience). I have never been audited.

          Comment

          • veritas
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2005
            • 3290

            #6
            If your girl friend worked in a certain county in Nevada it could be deductible.

            Comment

            • S T
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2005
              • 5053

              #7
              Oh Dear

              Oh dear am I missing deductions for my client!

              S

              Comment

              • jainen
                Banned
                • Jul 2005
                • 2215

                #8
                a big nuisance

                >>I am self-employed... the convenience of my employer<<

                I am self-employed too, but I don't find it convenient at all. Having a job is a big nuisance!

                Comment

                • OldJack
                  Banned
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 1689

                  #9
                  Originally posted by jainen
                  I am self-employed too, but I don't find it convenient at all. Having a job is a big nuisance!
                  Yeah... I know what you mean... I am too busy to work.

                  Comment

                  • Jim R
                    Junior Member
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 25

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Joe Btfsplk
                    I am self-employed and work at home, so I should be able to deduct 100% of the meals since they are provided for the convenience of my employer.

                    I once had a client who had some accountant who told him to deduct all of his housing and food on that basis. The IRS never audited him.
                    Self-employed do not have an employer. However I have heard of farmers who incorporate their farm and live their at "the convenience of thier employer" with their food and housing tax deductable. I do not do farm taxes, but I got the impression at one time this was common and accepted, and for all I know may still be.

                    Comment

                    • jainen
                      Banned
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 2215

                      #11
                      Great plan

                      Great plan, until you want a Section 121 exclusion.

                      Comment

                      • natiro
                        Senior Member
                        • Jun 2005
                        • 152

                        #12
                        Deduction

                        Not to get serious all the sudden in this amusing thread, but just wanted to point out that the 100% deduction for the Xmas party is allowed under IRC 274(e)(4) and 274(n)(2)(A) and has nothing to do with the concept of "convenience of the employer."

                        It's the latter code section which allows 100% deduction as it relates to the former code section which specifically discusses "expenses for recreational, social, or similar activities (including facilities therefor) primarily for the benefit of employees (other than employees who are highly compensated employees."

                        Also, Reg 1.274-2(f)(2)(v) says:
                        "Ordinarily, this exception applies to usual employee benefit programs such as expenses of a taxpayer (a) in holding Christmas parties, annual picnics, or summer outings, for his employees generally, or (b) of maintaining a swimming pool, baseball diamond, bowling alley, or golf course available to his employees generally"

                        This last part opens up all sorts of interesting possibilities that I had never considered before!

                        That said, I agree completely that being self employed isn't very convenient at all and sometime when I have nothing better to do, I'll see if I can find that in the code, too!

                        Comment

                        • Unregistered

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Jim R
                          Self-employed do not have an employer. However I have heard of farmers who incorporate their farm and live their at "the convenience of thier employer" with their food and housing tax deductable. I do not do farm taxes, but I got the impression at one time this was common and accepted, and for all I know may still be.
                          I'm thinking that's like the per diems for firemen and cops. There was a case were one of several owners of a closely held family farm corp was allowed to claim convinience of the employer. There are many cases that go the other way if it's single shareholder or H & W.

                          Comment

                          • jainen
                            Banned
                            • Jul 2005
                            • 2215

                            #14
                            Pollmaster

                            Pollmaster, I haven't voted yet because I can't figure out what's the difference between choice #1 and choice #4. I mean, the first and fourth choices (they aren't numbered).

                            Generally I find the office Christmas meal is not digestible at all, but that's not one of the choices.
                            Last edited by jainen; 11-30-2006, 12:11 PM.

                            Comment

                            • veritas
                              Senior Member
                              • Dec 2005
                              • 3290

                              #15
                              Well you are correct it is a pretty poor excuse for a poll. I think I may leave the polls to the experts.

                              Comment

                              Working...