Nominee Trust and residence sale

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kram BergGold
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2006
    • 2112

    #1

    Nominee Trust and residence sale

    In 2002 my client and her husband placed their residence in a nominee trust. In 2005 the husband died and in 2006 the house was sold. It was a primary residence for 40 years.
    Given this set of facts I feel the wife gets a 50% step up (does not qualify for 100% step up because of pre 1977 ownership or community property rules) ) and then section 121 exclusion. Does everyone agree?
    Now the wrinkle. At the time the nominee trust was set up an irrevocable trust was set up as well. One clause states all real esate owned by the grantors was to be in the irrevocable trust. However the irrevocable trust was intentionally written with clauses which made it defective. The house was titled to the nominee trust and sold by the nominee trust. So my feeling is I just ignore the irrevocable trust. Any thoughts?
  • Roland Slugg
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2006
    • 1860

    #2
    See another lawyer

    Dear Kram BergGold

    I've never heard of a "nominee trust." Is it just a different name for a "grantor trust?"
    Originally posted by Kram BergGold
    The irrevocable trust was intentionally written with clauses which made it defective.
    You can't be serious! However, if there are doubts regarding the bona-fides of that trust, or the other trust, the wife should have everything reviewed by a qualified estate attorney.

    If both trusts can be ignored, then W will definitely have a stepped-up basis in half the house, and, perhaps in all of it. Even if only half, her $250k ยง121 exclusion may be sufficient to eliminate all of the gain from taxation.
    Roland Slugg
    "I do what I can."

    Comment

    • Kram BergGold
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2006
      • 2112

      #3
      Roland

      Yes, a nominee trust is another name for a grantor trust.

      Comment

      • BOB W
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2005
        • 4061

        #4
        Trusts

        My understanding is that a trust (Rev or Irrev) needs to be funded in order for it to valid.
        This post is for discussion purposes only and should be verified with other sources before actual use.

        Many times I post additional info on the post, Click on "message board" for updated content.

        Comment

        • Roland Slugg
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2006
          • 1860

          #5
          More reason to see a new attorney

          Originally posted by BOB W
          My understanding is that a trust (Rev or Irrev) needs to be funded in order for it to valid.
          Very good point. However, if the nominee/grantor trust [Thanks KBG for clarifying the terminology] required that the house be transferred into the irrev. trust, this could be a serious issue. I'd definitely have a qualified estate lawyer look into it.
          Roland Slugg
          "I do what I can."

          Comment

          Working...