S Corporation donation

[Dezsrtax]

May an S Corporation issue nonvoting stock in a ratio of 9 shares for every share of voting stock and warrant in a ratio of 10 warrants for every share of nonvoting stock?
Thus if the S Corporation has 1000 of voting stock outstanding, 9000 shares of nonvoting stock and warrants excisable into 90000 shares on nonvoting stock to the original shareholders.
The warrants may be exercised at any time over a period of years. The strike price on the warrants is set at a price that is least equal to 90% of the purported fair market of the newly issued nonvoting stock on the date the warrants are granted.
For this purpose, the fair market value of the nonvoting stock is claimed to be substantially reduced because of the existence of the warrants.
Shortly after the issuance of the nonvoting stock and the warrants, the original shareholders donate the nonvoting stock to an exempt organization.
The parties to the transaction claim that after the donation of the nonvoting stock, the exempt party owns 90% of the stock of the S corporation.
The parties further claim that any taxable income allocated on the nonvoting stock tot he exempt party is not subjected to tax on unrelated business income. (UBIT) under §511 and §514(or exempt party has offsetting UBIT NOLs).
The original shareholder might also claim a charitable contribution deduction under section §170 for the donation of the nonvoting stock to the exempt party.
In some variations of this transaction, the S corporation may issue nonvoting stock directly to the exempt party.
THIS A REQUEST FOR RESEARCH.
Please comment on the wrong doing of this transaction. Thank you.

[sea-tax]

As far as I understand it S-corps may only have one class of stock. If they issue multiple class of stocks then you will make the s-election invalid.

[dsi]

I found something you may want to read. See the attachment (I hope it worked).

[dsi]

Here is page 1 of 3:

Part Ill - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
S Corporation Tax Shelter
Notice 2004-30
The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department are aware of a type
of transaction, described below, in which S corporation shareholders attempt to transfer
the incidence of taxation on S corporation income by purportedly donating S corporation
nonvoting stock to an exempt organization, while retaining the economic benefits
associated with that stock. This notice alerts taxpayers and their representatives that
these transactions are tax avoidance transactions and identifies these transactions, and
substantially similar transactions, as listed transactions for purposes of § 1.601 1-4(b)(2)
of the Income Tax Regulations and §§ 301.61 11-2(b)(2) and 301.61 12-1 (b)(2) of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations. This notice also alerts parties involved with
these transactions to certain responsibilities that may arise from their involvement with
these transactions.
FACTS
In a typical transaction, an S corporation, its shareholders, and an organization
exempt from tax under § 501 (a) and described in either § 501 (c)(3) or 3 401 (a) of the
Internal Revenue Code (such as a tax-qualified retirement plan maintained by a state or
local government) (the exempt party) undertake the following steps. An S corporation
issues, pro rata to each of its shareholders (the original shareholders), nonvoting stock
and warrants that are exercisable into nonvoting stock. For example, the S corporation
issues nonvoting stock in a ratio of 9 shares for every share of voting stock and
warrants in a ratio of 10 warrants for every share of nonvoting stock. Thus, if the S
corporation has 1,000 shares of voting stock outstanding, the S corporation would issue
9,000 shares of nonvoting stock and warrants exercisable into 90,000 shares of
nonvoting stock to the original shareholders. The warrants may be exercised at any
time over a period of years. The strike price on the warrants is set at a price that is at
least equal to 90 percent of the purported fair market value of the newly issued
nonvoting stock on the date the warrants are granted. For this purpose, the fair market
value of the nonvoting stock is claimed to be substantially reduced because of the
existence of the warrants.
Shortly after the issuance of the nonvoting stock and the warrants, the original
shareholders donate the nonvoting stock to the exempt party. The parties to the
transaction claim that, after the donation of the nonvoting stock, the exempt party owns
90 percent of the stock of the S corporation. The parties further claim that any taxable

[dsi]

Part Ill - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
S Corporation Tax Shelter
Notice 2004-30
The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department are aware of a type
of transaction, described below, in which S corporation shareholders attempt to transfer
the incidence of taxation on S corporation income by purportedly donating S corporation
nonvoting stock to an exempt organization, while retaining the economic benefits
associated with that stock. This notice alerts taxpayers and their representatives that
these transactions are tax avoidance transactions and identifies these transactions, and
substantially similar transactions, as listed transactions for purposes of § 1.601 1-4(b)(2)
of the Income Tax Regulations and §§ 301.61 11-2(b)(2) and 301.61 12-1 (b)(2) of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations. This notice also alerts parties involved with
these transactions to certain responsibilities that may arise from their involvement with
these transactions.
FACTS
In a typical transaction, an S corporation, its shareholders, and an organization
exempt from tax under § 501 (a) and described in either § 501 (c)(3) or 3 401 (a) of the
Internal Revenue Code (such as a tax-qualified retirement plan maintained by a state or
local government) (the exempt party) undertake the following steps. An S corporation
issues, pro rata to each of its shareholders (the original shareholders), nonvoting stock
and warrants that are exercisable into nonvoting stock. For example, the S corporation
issues nonvoting stock in a ratio of 9 shares for every share of voting stock and
warrants in a ratio of 10 warrants for every share of nonvoting stock. Thus, if the S
corporation has 1,000 shares of voting stock outstanding, the S corporation would issue
9,000 shares of nonvoting stock and warrants exercisable into 90,000 shares of
nonvoting stock to the original shareholders. The warrants may be exercised at any
time over a period of years. The strike price on the warrants is set at a price that is at
least equal to 90 percent of the purported fair market value of the newly issued
nonvoting stock on the date the warrants are granted. For this purpose, the fair market
value of the nonvoting stock is claimed to be substantially reduced because of the
existence of the warrants.
Shortly after the issuance of the nonvoting stock and the warrants, the original
shareholders donate the nonvoting stock to the exempt party. The parties to the
transaction claim that, after the donation of the nonvoting stock, the exempt party owns
90 percent of the stock of the S corporation. The parties further claim that any taxable
income allocated on the nonvoting stock to the exempt party is not subject to tax on
unrelated business income (UBIT) under 3s 51 1 through 514 (or the exempt party has
offsetting UBIT net operating losses). The original shareholders might also claim a
charitable contribution deduction under § 170 for the donation of the nonvoting stock to
the exempt party. In some variations of this transaction, the S corporation may issue
nonvoting stock directly to the exempt party.
Pursuant to one or more agreements (typically redemption agreements, rights of
first refusal, put agreements, or pledge agreements) entered into as part of the
transaction, the exempt party can require the S corporation or the original shareholders
to purchase the exempt party's nonvoting stock for an amount equal to the fair market
value of the stock as of the date the shares are presented for repurchase. In some
cases, the S corporation or the original shareholders guarantee that the exempt party
will receive the fair market value of the nonvoting stock as of the date the stock was
given to the exempt party if that amount is greater than the fair market value on the
repurchase date.
Because they own 100 percent of the voting stock of the S corporation, the
original shareholders have the power to determine the amount and timing of any
distributions made with respect to the voting and nonvoting stock. The original
shareholders exercise that power to cause the S corporation to limit or suspend
distributions to its shareholders while the exempt party purportedly owns the nonvoting
stock. For tax purposes, however, during that period, 90 percent of the S corporation's
income is allocated to the exempt party and 10 percent of the S corporation's income is
allocated to the original shareholders. The transaction is structured for the original
shareholders to exercise the warrants and dilute the shares of nonvoting stock held by
the exempt party, or for the S corporation or the original shareholders to purchase the
nonvoting stock from the exempt party at a value that is substantially reduced by reason
of the existence of the warrants. In either event, the exempt party will receive a share of
the total economic benefit of stock ownership that is substantially lower than the share
of the S corporation income allocated to the exempt party.
DISCUSSION
The transaction described in this notice is designed to artificially shift the
incidence of taxation on S corporation income away from taxable shareholders to the
exempt party. In this manner, the original shareholders attempt to avoid paying income
tax on most of the S corporation's income over a period of time.
The Service intends to challenge the purported tax benefits from this transaction
based on the application of various theories, including judicial doctrines such as
substance over form. Under appropriate facts and circumstances, the Service also may
argue that the existence of the warrants results in a violation of the single class of stock
requirement of § 1361(b)(l)(D), thus terminating the corporation's status as an S
corporation. See, e.g., 95 1 ,1361 -1 (1)(4)(ii) and (iii).
Transactions that are the same as, or substantially similar to, the transaction
described in this notice are identified as "listed transactions" for purposes of
§§ 1.601 1-4(b)(2), 301.61 11 -2(b)(2), and 301.61 12-1 (b)(2) effective April 1, 2004, the
date this notice was released to the public. Independent of their classification as listed
transactions, transactions that are the same as, or substantially similar to, the
transaction described in this notice may already be subject to the disclosure
requirements of § 601 1 (§ 1.601 1-4), the tax shelter registration requirements of § 61 11
(§ 301.61 11-IT and § 301.61 11-2), or the list maintenance requirements of § 61 12
(§ 301.61 12-1). Under the authority of §I ,601 1-4(c)(3)(i)(A), the exempt party in the
listed transaction described in this notice will also be treated as a participant in the
transaction (whether or not otherwise a participant). The exempt party will be treated as
participating in the transaction for the taxable year of the purported donation, the
taxable year of the reacquisition, and all intervening taxable years. Pending further
review and possible additional guidance, this notice does not apply to any investment in
employer securities, as defined in § 409(1), by an employee stock ownership plan
subject to the requirements of § 409(p).
Persons who are required to register these tax shelters under § 61 11 but have
failed to do so may be subject to the penalty under Cj 6707(a). Persons who are
required to maintain lists of investors under 9 61 12 but have failed to do so (or who fail
to provide those lists when requested by the Service) may be subject to the penalty
under § 6708(a). In addition, the Service may impose penalties on parties involved in
these transactions or substantially similar transactions, including the accuracy-related
penalty under § 6662.
The Service and the Treasury Department recognize that some taxpayers may
have filed tax returns taking the position that they were entitled to the purported tax
benefits of the type of transaction described in this notice. These taxpayers should take
appropriate corrective action and ensure that their transactions are disclosed properly.
The principal author of this notice is Tara P. Volungis of the Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (Passthroughs & Special Industries). For further information regarding
this notice contact Ms. Volungis at (202) 622-3070 (not a toll-free call).

[outwest]

A variation on this I'm seeing...

uses a family limited partnership with the "charity" holding the limited partner interests. Charity cannot buy, sell or demand cash from the donation. Partnership takes big charitable deduction, usually on the estate return. They carry on business as usual in the partnership and the charity gets nothing unless the general partners kick out a little optional cash. Eventually, the charity may sell it's interest back to the partnership at pennies on the dollar.

And yes the IRS is aware of this one also. They use the acronym of CHAR-FLIP.

Doug

[jainen]

a lot less trouble

If they just forged a receipt and lied about the donation, wouldn't that be a lot less trouble?

[sea-tax]

If they just forged a receipt and lied about the donation, wouldn't that be a lot less trouble?

Now Jainen is that a touch of sarcasm!

[jainen]

Just sharing

Just sharing a little tip I've picked up from some of my own clients.