Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Section 179 compared to Special Allowance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Section 179 compared to Special Allowance

    Both methods yield the same result. The Sec 179 works for Iowa but not the Special Allowance.
    Any other benefits from one verses the other?

    #2
    You mean like the benefits comparison in TTB 9-11? Also, see pages 9-7 through 9-11. And, check on the states.

    Comment


      #3
      Yes, I checked on the States and Iowa does accept the 179 but not the Special Allowance. The only drawback to Sec. 179 is the potential for recapture.

      Comment


        #4
        The special allowance, or Bonus Depreciation, is taken without regard to income. 179 expensing needs income, Bonus does not. So, if your client’s net income is $5,000 and they want to use Section 179, they can only offset the $5,000 (unless a Sole Prop with other wages/income), and the remainder carries forward.

        Bonus says, I’ll take the entire deduction, regardless of income, and create a loss.

        Now, whether there is basis to take the loss or the activity is passive, that’s another story.
        Circular 230 Disclosure:

        Don't even think about using the information in this message!

        Comment

        Working...
        X