I went to my corner for a while--fair enough. Took the time to run a little on-line CPE over at Kleinrock, and here is what I learned.
Courts have held that a revenue ruling is not entitled to the deference accorded a statute or a Treasury regulation. However, the courts have not been clear on exactly how much weight revenue rulings do carry.
The Fifth Circuit has stated that revenue rulings are generally "given weight as expressing the studied view of the agency whose duty it is to carry out the statute."
In contrast, the Tax Court's position is that "revenue rulings are nothing more than the legal contentions of a frequent litigant, undeserving of any more or less consideration than the conclusory statements in a party's brief."
Courts have held that a revenue ruling is not entitled to the deference accorded a statute or a Treasury regulation. However, the courts have not been clear on exactly how much weight revenue rulings do carry.
The Fifth Circuit has stated that revenue rulings are generally "given weight as expressing the studied view of the agency whose duty it is to carry out the statute."
In contrast, the Tax Court's position is that "revenue rulings are nothing more than the legal contentions of a frequent litigant, undeserving of any more or less consideration than the conclusory statements in a party's brief."
Comment