Anyone else having issues with 8962 not computing? Line 24 is 1400 line 25 is 2928, but it's not putting the repayment on line 27.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Proseries 8962
Collapse
X
-
This is absolutely insane. They don’t have a clue why line 29 is not correct, and I don’t think she understood how it is calculated.
Here’s the situation: MFJ, have W’2 and both have small Sch C businesses. Her net profit is 5495 less ½ SE of 388 leaves 5107. I direct entered SEHI amount on her C 5,103 which is Medicare, supplement, etc.
His Sch net profit is 4758 less ½ SE of 336 leaves 4422. He paid 5,765 for ACA plan and has a repayment amount of 1,522. Should not the amount of line 29 for him be 4422? Pro is calculating it to be 1824. I have the 1095A linked to his business.
Moral of story is if you have a Sch C with a 1095A check the math and don’t rely on software.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Twin Turbo Z View PostIf you dont link the 1095a to schedule c ? She has medicare ? Is the 1095a for both ? Yes I know, support sucks. They have several local tax rates wrong and I have been trying to get them to correct them. They should have a global option to change "generic" tax rates (IMHO).
Comment
-
Ok, I sheepishly need to admit the incorrect calculation was operator error. When I linked the 1095A I entered numbers for months rather than using drop box. Entering 1 produced a result of October rather than January.
However, if the SEHI is coming from the 1095A rather than direct entry on C worksheet, it is not using the amount to reduce the QBI income. Something people will want to be aware of.
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment