Actually, the question concerns Life Insurance (which is actually "Death" Insurance).
Mortimer has two children, a fiscally conservative, honest, and intelligent daughter, and a frivolous, churlish, wasteful son. He has a $200,000 life insurance policy, and suffers a sudden and tragic death, dying without a will.
He has some realty, personalty, and investments in the estate created by his death. However, we find out that the only beneficiary of his life insurance policy is his daughter. Many times in recent years, he told his daughter that if anything should happen to him, she would be the sole beneficiary, as he knew she would split everything with his less-than-frugal son.
I see two possible problems, and I'm asking for help and comments:
1) By making his daughter sole beneficiary, the life insurance proceeds have by-passed his estate, and are NOT a part of his estate. That means if daughter shares with son, there may be gift tax, as title is passing from one family member to another. Can this be avoided by having the daughter disavow the proceeds? This might be more of a legal question than a tax question, but it has obvious tax implications.
2) There is a mortgage against the realty in the father's estate, such that if the estate does not have access to the life insurance proceeds, it will otherwise be insolvent. Does this necessity provide an avenue for the daughter to share the life insurance with the estate?
This situation might best be addressed to attorneys in the domestic state, but I'll bet some of you can help, if you will.
Thanks, Ron Jordan
Mortimer has two children, a fiscally conservative, honest, and intelligent daughter, and a frivolous, churlish, wasteful son. He has a $200,000 life insurance policy, and suffers a sudden and tragic death, dying without a will.
He has some realty, personalty, and investments in the estate created by his death. However, we find out that the only beneficiary of his life insurance policy is his daughter. Many times in recent years, he told his daughter that if anything should happen to him, she would be the sole beneficiary, as he knew she would split everything with his less-than-frugal son.
I see two possible problems, and I'm asking for help and comments:
1) By making his daughter sole beneficiary, the life insurance proceeds have by-passed his estate, and are NOT a part of his estate. That means if daughter shares with son, there may be gift tax, as title is passing from one family member to another. Can this be avoided by having the daughter disavow the proceeds? This might be more of a legal question than a tax question, but it has obvious tax implications.
2) There is a mortgage against the realty in the father's estate, such that if the estate does not have access to the life insurance proceeds, it will otherwise be insolvent. Does this necessity provide an avenue for the daughter to share the life insurance with the estate?
This situation might best be addressed to attorneys in the domestic state, but I'll bet some of you can help, if you will.
Thanks, Ron Jordan
Comment