Anything new on the situation where a client owes a penalty for not having sufficient 2016 medical coverage?
I have a few clients who would like to file their taxes, but (at least in theory) they owe a penalty for lack of sufficient 2016 coverage. I can't, with a clear conscience, mark the line 61 box as "full-year coverage" just to clear the calculated penalty. Also I would like to avoid the scenario (time/cost) of later having to file amended federal returns.
So. . .is the word still "WAIT" ??
Related question: I know that states (like NC) "piggyback" the federal return for efiling. I was considering efiling a few "state only" returns for these clients since the federal extra stuff is not relevant to the state. But it appears that approach is also blocked. . .since the companion federal return has not been finalized. Is that correct?
FE
I have a few clients who would like to file their taxes, but (at least in theory) they owe a penalty for lack of sufficient 2016 coverage. I can't, with a clear conscience, mark the line 61 box as "full-year coverage" just to clear the calculated penalty. Also I would like to avoid the scenario (time/cost) of later having to file amended federal returns.
So. . .is the word still "WAIT" ??
Related question: I know that states (like NC) "piggyback" the federal return for efiling. I was considering efiling a few "state only" returns for these clients since the federal extra stuff is not relevant to the state. But it appears that approach is also blocked. . .since the companion federal return has not been finalized. Is that correct?
FE
Comment