Client owns and lives in a 2 Family. She lives in 60% and rents out 40%. In 2016 she spent $28,000 fixing the exterior of the house, due to the damage caused by squirrels. The $11,200 of work attributable to the rental section, can it be argued that it is a repair due to the damage caused by the squirrels or does it have to be depreciated over 27.5 years. None of the new safe harbors will work in this situation? Let me add, the client is only in the 15% bracket but is desperate to reduce her balance due.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Repair or Improvement
Collapse
X
-
It depends on whether like materials were used which would make it repairs vs upgraded materials used which could make it an improvement and whether the materials used are not considered a permanent part of the building such as a whole house air-conditioner/duct heater or replacement windows. Another way to put it would be if the items were of the kind that normal maintenance/upkeep then it would be repairs. If it raises the value of the house it is an improvement. You may have some of both so the rental repairs and improvements would have to be allocated as such. The TP residence repairs/maintenance is not deductible and the allocated improvements portion would be added to the basis of the TP portion of the building.Believe nothing you have not personally researched and verified.
Comment
-
Did the taxpayer file a claim with the insurance company?
I would think it would be a restoration under Reg 1.263(a)-(3)(k)(1) and thus capitalized. You can also look at Example 6 in Reg 1.263(a)-(3)(k)(7) where a building fell into disrepair and they had to shore up the walls and replace siding and that was a restoration and capitalized.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ttbtaxes View PostDid the taxpayer file a claim with the insurance company?
I would think it would be a restoration under Reg 1.263(a)-(3)(k)(1) and thus capitalized. You can also look at Example 6 in Reg 1.263(a)-(3)(k)(7) where a building fell into disrepair and they had to shore up the walls and replace siding and that was a restoration and capitalized.Taxes after all are the dues that we pay for the privileges of membership in an organized society. - FDR
Comment
-
I'm on the side of repair, but I think more questions need to be asked and answered.
For a restoration in this case, I'd ask, did the building fall so far into disrepair that it no longer functioned as a rental?
For a betterment, did it correct a problem in existence prior to acquisition?
There's more to it than that, of course, but I have collected enough TPR flowcharts to know that it takes more analysis than just finding one vaguely similar example in the regs to come up with a final answer."You said it, they'll never know the difference. Come on, we'll paint our way out!" - Moe Howard
Comment
-
Kram,
Have you considered a Partial Asset Disposition. Sounds like the siding (or what ever the squirrels liked) was destroyed well before its time. You probably have a deducible loss.
I know many don't like PAD because it is a bit more difficult to calculate. If you need help, I can send you a spreadsheet that will calculate the PAD for you - pm me your email. If you send the particulars -
Cost of materials & Labor,
original date of the house & purchase date (or PIS date),
date of replacement,
accumulated depreciation of the building,
building unadjusted cost.
I'll fill in the spreadsheet and send it to you,
Mike
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment