Question for group:
1. How are you treating public police K-9 unit handlers claims for "home office deduction" or employee business expenses? The officer(s) claim they have to keep the animal with them when off duty.
a. What kind of things do you require in the way of substantiation?
2. Does it matter, to you/your practice, if there is a written provision of a collective bargaining agreement?
3. Does it matter if, in the absence of a CBA provision, the officer has a letter from the Chief of Police, shift commander or equivalent on Department of municipality letterhead that the officer must 'kennel' the dog at the officer's residence during off duty time so as to have the animal available 24 hours a day?
4. Would it matter if the officer treats the dog as a family pet while at their residence?
4a: would if matter, for purposes of deductions of any type, if the officer was featured in a local newspaper article stating "at home, [name of dog] is treated like a member of the family?
5. In your practice or actual knowledge is there a "fixed boarding amount" like $29/a day for these situations?
6. Is there a practical or functional difference between a requirement to keep your department issued service weapon(s) and a department issues canine?
7. If you take deductions for the canine in home, do you take show them on Schedule A, "2106" misc. deductions, OR do you treat them as a 'charitable' donation of good to the municipality?
8. If you are taking deductions like that for police officer k-9 handlers in your practice, what "tax" authority do you rely on?
Background: taxpayer claimed that "some cop out in Jackson, MI claimed $29/day and he was audited it was allowed. and I want YOU (meaning us) to do the same." And no, there is no department letter or CBA covering this, and it isn't clear if the officer is being reimbursed or otherwise provided with dog food; however, all vet bills and grooming are paid for by the municipality. For this post, municipality refers to any governmental agency fed, state, local, whatever.
1. How are you treating public police K-9 unit handlers claims for "home office deduction" or employee business expenses? The officer(s) claim they have to keep the animal with them when off duty.
a. What kind of things do you require in the way of substantiation?
2. Does it matter, to you/your practice, if there is a written provision of a collective bargaining agreement?
3. Does it matter if, in the absence of a CBA provision, the officer has a letter from the Chief of Police, shift commander or equivalent on Department of municipality letterhead that the officer must 'kennel' the dog at the officer's residence during off duty time so as to have the animal available 24 hours a day?
4. Would it matter if the officer treats the dog as a family pet while at their residence?
4a: would if matter, for purposes of deductions of any type, if the officer was featured in a local newspaper article stating "at home, [name of dog] is treated like a member of the family?
5. In your practice or actual knowledge is there a "fixed boarding amount" like $29/a day for these situations?
6. Is there a practical or functional difference between a requirement to keep your department issued service weapon(s) and a department issues canine?
7. If you take deductions for the canine in home, do you take show them on Schedule A, "2106" misc. deductions, OR do you treat them as a 'charitable' donation of good to the municipality?
8. If you are taking deductions like that for police officer k-9 handlers in your practice, what "tax" authority do you rely on?
Background: taxpayer claimed that "some cop out in Jackson, MI claimed $29/day and he was audited it was allowed. and I want YOU (meaning us) to do the same." And no, there is no department letter or CBA covering this, and it isn't clear if the officer is being reimbursed or otherwise provided with dog food; however, all vet bills and grooming are paid for by the municipality. For this post, municipality refers to any governmental agency fed, state, local, whatever.
Comment