Donate fruits to charities
Collapse
X
-
-
Ridiculous
I can't believe anyone, especially Sluggo, could believe produce such as fruit could be LTCG property.
Fruits/produce are operational revenue items. Even if no revenue they should be considered as such. In fact, they would even meet the definition of inventory, and can even have an associated cost if rules for absorbing overhead are observed.
The key word above is "operational" as opposed to being investment items. The trees come closer to being "investment items" and if sold could conceivably be reported on a 4797.
Fruit is not capital gain property, even if held for over a year. In fact, I'm not sure what value fruits would have if over a year old since they are perishable items. Maybe some rare exotic fruits can last more than a year, but certainly none of the common fruits like bananas, oranges, cantaloupes, apples, etc.
Deduct the FMV if given timely to the charity before they rot. I would consider them as absorbing overhead and bearing a cost, thus I would not deduct overhead expenses if the remainder of the operation were applied against income.Comment
-
If you consider the annual growth cycle of citrus trees, it's arguably a year-long cycle, so by the time the fruit is picked and donated it is close to a year old ... start to finish. Furthermore, some kinds of oranges and lemons can be left on the tree for up to a year after they first ripen.
Of course, we may see more of that in California, once all the migrant farm worker bad hombres are booted across the border wall. Lots of produce will be left to rot in the field, a lot of which normally goes to most of the rest of the country."You said it, they'll never know the difference. Come on, we'll paint our way out!" - Moe Howard
"That's enough! When you didn't know what you were talking about, you really had something! [to Curly]" -Moe HowardComment
-
You question "taxpayers decided to SELL their produce, they would get capital gain treatment on the sales of the fruits???" in this reply post does not specify if it applies to personal use property or business assets; investment property and/or property used for the production of income.
and as you may know, everything depends on facts and circumstances and their interpretation, before one makes a decision. No different then when a reply poster recommends to a poster to review a number of specific sections of the IRS code to their posted scenario. At that point the poster can review the suggested sections of the IRS code to see if the sections may or may not apply to their posted scenario.
So the benefit of this forum is to take all the suggested reply posts and decide after their own research what may apply to their specific scenario. To do otherwise could be misleading.Last edited by TAXNJ; 03-07-2017, 08:57 PM.Always cite your source for support to defend your opinionComment
-
So is there absolutely no other possibility? Such as growers paying higher wages to US citizen employees, which in turn are passed along to consumers as higher prices? Or perhaps hiring migrant workers who are properly documented, even though they would need to be paid more than illegal aliens, with those costs built into the final price? Unless all the growers are complete idiots, it seems to me that after some initial adjustments, supply and demand would somehow sort out this market in much the same way as it does other commodities.Last edited by JohnH; 03-07-2017, 11:12 AM."The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectful" - John Kenneth GalbraithComment
-
I can't believe anyone, especially Sluggo, could believe produce such as fruit could be LTCG property.
Fruits/produce are operational revenue items. Even if no revenue they should be considered as such. In fact, they would even meet the definition of inventory, and can even have an associated cost if rules for absorbing overhead are observed.
The key word above is "operational" as opposed to being investment items. The trees come closer to being "investment items" and if sold could conceivably be reported on a 4797.
Fruit is not capital gain property, even if held for over a year. In fact, I'm not sure what value fruits would have if over a year old since they are perishable items. Maybe some rare exotic fruits can last more than a year, but certainly none of the common fruits like bananas, oranges, cantaloupes, apples, etc.
Deduct the FMV if given timely to the charity before they rot. I would consider them as absorbing overhead and bearing a cost, thus I would not deduct overhead expenses if the remainder of the operation were applied against income.
But to state "I can't believe anyone, especially Sluggo, could believe produce such as fruit could be LTCG property." is unfair to Roland's reply post just as if someone stated the same to your reply post.
A lot depends on the assets classification if it is personal use property or business assets; investment property and/or property used for the production of income.Always cite your source for support to defend your opinionComment
-
That is all a reeeealllllllll stretch of anyone's common sense understanding of fruit growing on trees. Tell me the last time you consumed an orange that had been on the tree for a full year.
Of course, we may see more of that in California, once all the migrant farm worker bad hombres are booted across the border wall. Lots of produce will be left to rot in the field, a lot of which normally goes to most of the rest of the country.Always cite your source for support to defend your opinionComment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment