When an S Corp liquidates, can the previous years losses carried forward due to lack of basis be taken on the 1040?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
S Corp Carryforward Losses
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Auto View PostThey put in capital in 2014 bringing their stock basis back to near nothing but not negative.
Do you prepare the 1120S or only the 1040 for shareholder?
Comment
-
Originally posted by kathyc2 View PostIt would be what their basis was for 2015. If it's a single shareholder I can't see where they wouldn't have sufficient basis to cover past losses unless they defaulted on liabilities. If there are several shareholders some may have basis to cover past losses and others may not.
Do you prepare the 1120S or only the 1040 for shareholder?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Auto View PostUnfortunately, I prepare both and am always in a world of confusion once these S Corps start taking huge distributions bringing RE into the negative. They had a company loan (none shareholder) and then they personally paid that loan off. Plus they paid company expenses out of their own pocket, also contributing to their capital. The amount of the company loan they personally paid off and the company expenses they paid personally was in an amount a little higher than their negative RE. did I miss the boat last year not taking their previous year carry forward losses?
1) If they paid off the business loan, the entry should have been to debit Loan and credit Due to Shareholder. This gives them debt basis.
2) If they personally paid business expenses how was it booked? If the debit was to the expense what was the credit?
3) If the reason for negative RE is due to a distribution over RE rather than from a loss, then the excess amount should have been taxable income to them in the year(s) it happened and they would have a different outside basis than what shows on the corporate books.
Work through the accounting entries to close out the balance sheet accounts. When you say "they" I assume you are talking amount a H/W who are the only shareholders? If that's true I can't think of a way they would not have sufficient basis to claim all losses unless they defaulted on liabilities.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kathyc2 View PostYou just said several things there that affect basis.
1) If they paid off the business loan, the entry should have been to debit Loan and credit Due to Shareholder. This gives them debt basis.
2) If they personally paid business expenses how was it booked? If the debit was to the expense what was the credit?
3) If the reason for negative RE is due to a distribution over RE rather than from a loss, then the excess amount should have been taxable income to them in the year(s) it happened and they would have a different outside basis than what shows on the corporate books.
Work through the accounting entries to close out the balance sheet accounts. When you say "they" I assume you are talking amount a H/W who are the only shareholders? If that's true I can't think of a way they would not have sufficient basis to claim all losses unless they defaulted on liabilities.
Of course they are H/W shareholders with terrible accounting records. But the answers to your questions is yes, when they took distributions in excess of RE I claimed that as Distributions in Excess of Capital. the expenses paid personally by them went into Added Paid in Capital, as did the loan they paid off. So I am thinking that when they paid that loan and made those expense payments personally, that is when I should have claimed their previous years carry forward losses on their personal return. Am I right? I'm thinking I may be looking at an amendment here due to my error.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Auto View PostOf course they are H/W shareholders with terrible accounting records. But the answers to your questions is yes, when they took distributions in excess of RE I claimed that as Distributions in Excess of Capital. the expenses paid personally by them went into Added Paid in Capital, as did the loan they paid off. So I am thinking that when they paid that loan and made those expense payments personally, that is when I should have claimed their previous years carry forward losses on their personal return. Am I right? I'm thinking I may be looking at an amendment here due to my error.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kathyc2 View PostIt depends. If they had a loss in 14 you could have used the additional basis to claim the 14 loss but not the carryover losses. Carryover losses stay until used against profits or disposed of.
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment