Can an owner operator use the standard mileage rate instead of the actual expenses and depreciation?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Owner/Operator Long Haul Trucking
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ray's Tax View PostCan an owner operator use the standard mileage rate instead of the actual expenses and depreciation?Taxes after all are the dues that we pay for the privileges of membership in an organized society. - FDR
-
Originally posted by Ray's Tax View PostCan an owner operator use the standard mileage rate instead of the actual expenses and depreciation?
Originally posted by ATSMAN View PostAssuming he is the owner of the truck he can choose to use standard mileage rate. An employee must use actual expenses.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TaxGuyBill View PostI suspect that the actual expenses would result in a MUCH better deduction.
??? Why would an employee need to use the actual expenses?
One caveat to using standard rate is also that the vehicle in question had not taken actual expenses in previous year(s).
Comment
-
Oops
I stand corrected, in Rev Proc 2010-51 it states,
(2) Section 4.05(1) is modified to allow taxpayers to use the business standard
mileage rate to calculate the amount of deductions for automobiles used for hire, such
as taxicabs.
It doesn't mention big rig trucks but it does mention the vehicle must be a "passenger" vehicle. Then you could argue that you could fit a passenger in a big rig. Boy, this could run you around in circles for sure!Circular 230 Disclosure:
Don't even think about using the information in this message!
Comment
-
Quote: ??? Why would an employee need to use the actual expenses?
that's my question too...if employee owns the truck and is not reimbursed by employer for expenses it would be his choice.
If employer owns the truck and doesn't reimburse the expenses then the employee should have the choice of mileage minus depreciation amt or actual expenses minus depreciation because the owner is probably depreciating the truck as an asset. I seriously doubt you would ever find this situation.Believe nothing you have not personally researched and verified.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roland Slugg View PostNo. The SMR is only for business use of passenger automobiles, including vans, pickups or panel trucks.
I can't find anything that would prohibit the Standard Mileage Rate from being used.
SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS
.01 Standard mileage rate. The term “standard mileage rate” means the amount the Service provides for optional use by taxpayers to substantiate the amount of—
(1) Deductible costs of operating for business purposes automobiles (including vans, pickups, or panel trucks) they own or lease, and
(2) Deductible costs of operating automobiles for charitable, medical, or moving expense purposes.
SECTION 4. BUSINESS STANDARD MILEAGE RATE
.01 Use of the business standard mileage rate. A taxpayer may use the business standard mileage rate (published in an annual notice) to substantiate the amount of a deduction for an automobile that a taxpayer either owns or leases. A taxpayer generally may deduct an amount equal to either the business standard mileage rate times the number of business miles traveled or the actual costs (both fixed and variable) the taxpayer pays or incurs that are allocable to traveling those business miles (subject to the limitations in section 4.05 of this revenue procedure).
.05 Limitations.
(1) A taxpayer may not use the business standard mileage rate to compute the deductible expenses of five or more automobiles a taxpayer owns or leases and uses simultaneously (such as in fleet operations).
(2) A taxpayer may not use the business standard mileage rate to compute the deductible business expenses of an automobile a taxpayer leases unless the taxpayer uses either the business standard mileage rate or a fixed and variable rate allowance (FAVR allowance) (as provided in section 6 of this revenue procedure) for the entire lease period.
(3) A taxpayer may not use the business standard mileage rate to compute the deductible expenses of an automobile for which the taxpayer has (a) claimed depreciation using a method other than straight-line for its estimated useful life, (b) claimed a § 179 deduction, (c) claimed the additional first-year depreciation allowance under, for example, § 168(k) or § 168(n), or (d) used the Accelerated Cost Recovery System (ACRS) under former § 168 or the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) under current § 168. By using the business standard mileage rate, the taxpayer has elected to exclude the automobile (if owned) from MACRS pursuant to § 168(f)(1). If, after using the business standard mileage rate, the taxpayer uses actual costs, the taxpayer must use straight-line depreciation for the automobile’s remaining estimated useful life (subject to the applicable depreciation deduction limitations under § 280F).
(4) A taxpayer who is an employee of the United States Postal Service may not use the business standard mileage rate or this revenue procedure to compute the amount of the taxpayer’s deductible automobile expenses incurred in performing services involving the collection and delivery of mail on a rural route if the taxpayer receives qualified reimbursements (as defined in § 162(o)) for the expenses. See § 162(o) for the rules that apply to these qualified reimbursements.
Comment
-
I had one instance several years back where the owner operator of one truck used SMR instead of actual expenses because his log book was more accurate than his girlfriend's accounting of his business expenses! If I recall correctly he filled up his tanks @ several hundred dollars with cash and could not find the receipts! His excuse was that cash price for diesel was cheaper than credit card.Taxes after all are the dues that we pay for the privileges of membership in an organized society. - FDR
Comment
-
Should be a No-Brainer
The expenses of operating a tractor-trailer rig are HUGE - hard to operate under $1.25-$1.50 per mile nowadays and will get worse when diesel fuel goes back up. Why would anyone choose the standard mileage rate?
I'll go even further - there are occasionally attempts to increase income to maximize brackets for EIC. I don't even agree with that since there we are not supposed to ignore expenses that should be consistent with the business when claiming EIC.
And we're having all this discussion about an option which shouldn't even exist. Very much like arguing about the color of a rope to lasso a fish.
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment