Client operates (part-time) one of those businesses where product is purchased (required) and sold to customers both from inventory and via website direct from the company on commission. TP tells me "everybody" deducts their personal-use product since it is used to demonstrate how effective it is (i.e, "I use it, so it works.") They call it an "advertising" expense. I can see it if the same product was used over & over, but that is not what's happening. Any opinions?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Personal Use Product
Collapse
X
-
Deduct the products pulled from inventory for personal use from the cost of inventory. They're personal. (Do you deduct your shaving supplies so you look more like a clean-cut, honest preparer?!) Not a business expense. Only "testers" that customers and prospective customers can try out (put on a little hand lotion, for instance) would be a marketing expense. Everybody Does It. Not MY clients.
-
I had a client who wanted to deduct her pricey floor lamp for her living room to show off the clothing line that she sold. She had only two showings for the entire year, in her living room. No way; it's a personal use lamp and would be there whether or not she was in the business of selling clothes. Maybe she'll rent a lamp for the hour or two showing next year!
Comment
-
just because they do it doesn't make it deductible. This is like the airline stew who wants to claim nylons and makeup because on the job is the only time she wears them. It isn't whether they use the item personally but whether they can use it personallyBelieve nothing you have not personally researched and verified.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Burke View PostIRS used to have a Publication 911 titled "Direct Sellers" which covered a lot of issues, including this one. But the latest edition I can find is 2003. Apparently, it is no longer offered.
(In the interest of clarification and as a warning - this is not intended to serve as a cite...)"The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectful" - John Kenneth Galbraith
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohnH View Post
Comment
-
That raises an interesting chicken-and-egg question.
Wonder which came first - the ATG or the Pub?
I did find the Pub 911 - as far as I an tell, the last time it was revised was 2003. The comments on the next year's version seem to hint that it was not going to be revised thereafter, and it looks like it fell off the radar screen after the 2004 filing year.
Last edited by JohnH; 04-22-2015, 01:16 PM."The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectful" - John Kenneth Galbraith
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohnH View PostThat raises an interesting chicken-and-egg question.
Wonder which came first - the ATG or the Pub?
I did find the Pub 911 - as far as I an tell, the last time it was revised was 2003. The comments on the next year's version seem to hint that it was not going to be revised thereafter, and it looks like it fell off the radar screen after the 2004 filing year.
http://www.unclefed.com/IRS-Forms/2004/p911.pdfLast edited by Burke; 04-23-2015, 04:06 PM.
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment