Schedule c losses and amending

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • taxgirl
    Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 95

    #1

    Schedule c losses and amending

    I have a client that has substantial schedule c losses - $30,000 - $40,000 every year. I have advised of IRS's stand on profitability etc. We discovered an error in 2013 which will result in an even larger loss (original filing (12,000) approx. and amended filing will be (40,000) approx. I do feel this t/p is in it as a business and meets the other criteria. My question is... If we amend, are we opening ourselves to an examination (which probably isn't far away)
  • Burke
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 7068

    #2
    Could be. How many years has this been going on? Are the losses being generated by depreciation, perhaps Section 179?

    Comment

    • New York Enrolled Agent
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2006
      • 1531

      #3
      Originally posted by taxgirl
      . I do feel this t/p is in it as a business and meets the other criteria.
      What you feel might not be enough.

      $30-$40K loss every year (your words) makes me wonder. Have you researched the nine factors in the income tax regulations for §183?

      Comment

      • taxgirl
        Member
        • Nov 2013
        • 95

        #4
        Losses have been going on for too long - 9 years and it is not due to depreciation. He is a professional angler. I have looked at the regs and feel that his situation checks all the boxes but as was stated, what I feel isn't necessarily what an agent may feel.

        Comment

        • taxgirl
          Member
          • Nov 2013
          • 95

          #5
          Losses have been going on for too long - 9 years and it is not due to depreciation. He is a professional angler. I have looked at the regs and feel that his situation checks all the boxes but as was stated, what I feel isn't necessarily what an agent may feel.

          Comment

          • Black Bart
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2005
            • 3357

            #6
            Although I once knew a small farmer who claimed an approx. $2,500 loss for twelve consecutive years with nary a ripple from the bogeyman, I don't think I'd tempt fate with a background like this guy's (assuming taxgirl's "9 yr." timeframe is right). On the other hand it's been my experience that IRS is not particularly interested in returns showing a loss (unless it's a loss in the gross - which once got me and an Amway lady slapped right quick). Nevertheless, a long stretch of $30-$40K might be enough to get their auditing juices flowing, so I don't think I'd do a 1040X. I believe amended returns are checked more often than normal returns (can't speak for others' opinions), which I'm thinking is because they're begging for special scrutiny. A solid string of outsized minuses might be quite interesting to a zealous agent.

            It makes you wonder - "how much is enough" for your guy? And maybe...whether you should let sleeping dogs lie.

            Comment

            • New York Enrolled Agent
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2006
              • 1531

              #7
              Originally posted by taxgirl
              Losses have been going on for too long - 9 years and it is not due to depreciation. He is a professional angler. I have looked at the regs and feel that his situation checks all the boxes but as was stated, what I feel isn't necessarily what an agent may feel.
              Clearly, this is an OPINION. I do not have any substantive facts before me but based on what you post, I'd be very surprised if your client could satisfy any of the factors from 4 through 9 in his favor.

              Comment

              • taxgirl
                Member
                • Nov 2013
                • 95

                #8
                Thank you. I appreciate all the input.

                Comment

                • DaveO
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 1453

                  #9
                  It would seem there would significant personal enjoyment derived from this. I have a Bass Tournament Fisherman for whom I have always reported on Line 21. Of course we are only talking a few thousand $ per year. Can't think the IRS would want to see a $30k bass boat on the depreciation schedule.
                  In other words, a democratic government is the only one in which those who vote for a tax can escape the obligation to pay it.
                  Alexis de Tocqueville

                  Comment

                  • Lion
                    Senior Member
                    • Jun 2005
                    • 4699

                    #10
                    Go through the nine factors. This sounds a lot like a hobby. If so, educate your client. If they won't be educated, fire them. It's not worth your license.

                    I had to have that discussion with an artist client last year. She realized it's her hobby based on our discussion. So, we've been reporting it that way.

                    Comment

                    • Roland Slugg
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 1860

                      #11
                      Originally posted by New York Enrolled Agent
                      ... based on what you post, I'd be very surprised if your client could satisfy any of the factors from 4 through 9 in his favor.
                      So would I, and I would add factor #1 to that list. And the few factors he might be able to pass, if any, are trivial in importance compared to the ones he would fail to pass.

                      Angling by definition is sport fishing. Maybe he enters a few tournaments every year, and his winnings serve to justify, in his own mind, that the entire activity is, somehow, a "business."

                      IMO the T/P would be a fool to file an amended return claiming even more expenses.

                      There is an ever bigger concern that I believe you should think about. If the situation is as big a sham as it appears, then YOU as the tax preparer may be at risk of being hit with penalties under Code §6694, relating to an "unreasonable position," or "willful or reckless conduct."
                      Roland Slugg
                      "I do what I can."

                      Comment

                      • AZ-Tax
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 2604

                        #12
                        Acquired a client with 9 years of Sch C losses

                        A couple years ago I acquired a client who had 9 years of Sch C losses none generated by any depr. In fact, the TP had losses every year since the Sch C business started. All those years a local CPA prepared the TP's tax return. Thankfully for me the first year I acquired TP, TP closed the business down the tax year previously. In my opinion, this had intentional losses all over it due to the spouse was making over $200K a year in a salary position.

                        Comment

                        • Burke
                          Senior Member
                          • Jan 2008
                          • 7068

                          #13
                          I had the same situation with a Bass fisherman. He took a loss the first year, when it was his full-time activity (he had no other job -- and thought he could support himself on this alone.) After that, he decided (maybe it was his wife who was still working who decided) that he needed another vocation. After that, we treated it as a hobby, following a discussion of what a business was and was not in the eyes of the IRS. I cannot imagine how this client is getting away with 9 years of these huge cash losses. Have you had the "what-are-you-living-on" discussion? How is he financing this activity? If he has losses in the $30 - $40K range, what is his gross income?
                          Last edited by Burke; 01-31-2015, 04:57 PM.

                          Comment

                          Working...