The title suggests I'm going to tell of some earthshaking truth behind the budget cuts at the IRS. Fact is, I don't really know the truth.
My long years of dealing with government agencies, however, have me very suspicious. First of all, my guess is that this did not really happen without the consent of the IRS Commissioner and Sec of the Treasury. I believe they can derive some BENEFIT to the cuts.
Will anyone venture what benefits there could be? For one, I see the real harm will come to taxpayers who are trying to defend themselves against the largesse behavior of the IRS that we have become accustomed to. As preparers, we are going to be affected horrendously.
The only ray of shining light from the govt has been the TaxPayer Advocate. Nina Olsen's people have already been dealt an impossible hand trying to get the IRS to do their job. Further cuts could render the TaxPayer Advocate unable to help anyone, and so ineffective that no one will avail themselves of this service. Two years of this could shut down the office altogether.
Already we as preparers involve ourselves in answering CP2000 and other notices, attempting to cancel levies, and other services that the IRS has been able to successfully throw up a brick wall. The effect of more cuts mean that corrective action expected from the IRS is postponed indefinitely. As most of you know, their collection office does not wait on the audit division to act, even on obvious items. It is quite convenient for the collection division to take the position that they "can't change anything".
As I see it, the so-called "IRS budget cuts" will do absolutely nothing to stop them from steamrolling taxpayers. What they lose in audit capabilities they will gain in collections and assessments which are uncontested.
As preparers, we should familiarize ourselves with the assessment and collection processes in place. In particular, response to the 90-day notice is more critical than ever.
Anyone else care to comment on this horrible budget-cutting inflicted on those poor souls at the IRS??
My long years of dealing with government agencies, however, have me very suspicious. First of all, my guess is that this did not really happen without the consent of the IRS Commissioner and Sec of the Treasury. I believe they can derive some BENEFIT to the cuts.
Will anyone venture what benefits there could be? For one, I see the real harm will come to taxpayers who are trying to defend themselves against the largesse behavior of the IRS that we have become accustomed to. As preparers, we are going to be affected horrendously.
The only ray of shining light from the govt has been the TaxPayer Advocate. Nina Olsen's people have already been dealt an impossible hand trying to get the IRS to do their job. Further cuts could render the TaxPayer Advocate unable to help anyone, and so ineffective that no one will avail themselves of this service. Two years of this could shut down the office altogether.
Already we as preparers involve ourselves in answering CP2000 and other notices, attempting to cancel levies, and other services that the IRS has been able to successfully throw up a brick wall. The effect of more cuts mean that corrective action expected from the IRS is postponed indefinitely. As most of you know, their collection office does not wait on the audit division to act, even on obvious items. It is quite convenient for the collection division to take the position that they "can't change anything".
As I see it, the so-called "IRS budget cuts" will do absolutely nothing to stop them from steamrolling taxpayers. What they lose in audit capabilities they will gain in collections and assessments which are uncontested.
As preparers, we should familiarize ourselves with the assessment and collection processes in place. In particular, response to the 90-day notice is more critical than ever.
Anyone else care to comment on this horrible budget-cutting inflicted on those poor souls at the IRS??
Comment