Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Repair/Capitalization Final Regulations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Repair/Capitalization Final Regulations

    I am displaying my ignorance but I am totally confused about this issue. I was hoping that TTB would shed some light on this but it doesn't. I am aware that this only happened recently.

    The main question is: Does this regulation in any way effect the depreciation system we have always used?

    F.e. Using these regulations, a taxpayer can elect to not capitalize all assets costing $500 or less (I am not referring to the 179 election). BUT this also constitutes a change in accounting method. Will a taxpayer have to follow this regulation to be able to expense any asset, even a low cost calculator? Again, don't bring Sec.179 into this picture.

    Does anything change in regards to deducting repairs on a building, see quote below:

    "A significant change for small taxpayers is that taxpayers with gross receipts of $10 million or less can elect to deduct, for buildings that initially cost $1 million or less, the lesser of $10,000 or 2% of the adjusted basis of the property for repairs, etc. each year."

    Again, change in accounting method required. My real question is, should a taxpayer adopt these regulations to not run into arguments with the IRS what is deductible as repairs?

    Please, someone tell me, that I am totally going overboard, and nothing really changed for the type of clients I am normally dealing with. I do have a client whose apartments complexes cost several million dollars, and I am concerned about possible bookkeeping consequences.

    #2
    Confusion in their clarification

    I, too, am very confused by this. I have read several sources with conflicting interpretations.

    Is anyone clear on this matter and can help us understand?

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by dkss View Post
      I, too, am very confused by this. I have read several sources with conflicting interpretations.

      Is anyone clear on this matter and can help us understand?
      I don't know if this is what you seek but CCH published an updated special briefing on this topic. Their briefings (many different topics) are very good - you can find more of them on the CCH site.

      Comment


        #4
        Source of confusion

        Thanks, NY EA. The CCH briefing was the main source of my confusion. Still confused, still hoping there will be a simple answer as to the question if small businesses need to do anything if they do not want to risk to have expenses thrown out later with no recourse.

        Comment


          #5
          $500 or $200?

          $200 limit for M&S. So when does the $500 limit apply?

          Originally posted by Gretel View Post
          I am displaying my ignorance but I am totally confused about this issue. I was hoping that TTB would shed some light on this but it doesn't. I am aware that this only happened recently.

          The main question is: Does this regulation in any way effect the depreciation system we have always used?

          F.e. Using these regulations, a taxpayer can elect to not capitalize all assets costing $500 or less (I am not referring to the 179 election). BUT this also constitutes a change in accounting method. Will a taxpayer have to follow this regulation to be able to expense any asset, even a low cost calculator? Again, don't bring Sec.179 into this picture.

          Does anything change in regards to deducting repairs on a building, see quote below:

          "A significant change for small taxpayers is that taxpayers with gross receipts of $10 million or less can elect to deduct, for buildings that initially cost $1 million or less, the lesser of $10,000 or 2% of the adjusted basis of the property for repairs, etc. each year."

          Again, change in accounting method required. My real question is, should a taxpayer adopt these regulations to not run into arguments with the IRS what is deductible as repairs?

          Please, someone tell me, that I am totally going overboard, and nothing really changed for the type of clients I am normally dealing with. I do have a client whose apartments complexes cost several million dollars, and I am concerned about possible bookkeeping consequences.
          Evan Appelman, EA

          Comment


            #6
            another article



            This is just one more article in the mix. Somehow I cannot believe that every taxpayer will have to file form 3115.

            Comment


              #7
              NATP's Tax Pro magazine has an entire article on this and that was their conclusion -- i.e, every taxpayer (who has depreciable property) has to file a 3115. I had a headache after trying to sort all these new regs out. Still confused.

              Comment

              Working...
              X