I know what TTB says about water and sewer fees, but had a second time client in last night that was kind of perturbed last year when I showed them that they could not claim said fees as part of the property tax deduction on Sch. A. They both insisted they had seen a recent news report about being able to claim 80% of those fees this year. I can't find anything indicating such, has anyone else heard this?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Water/Sewer "Tax"
Collapse
X
-
Fees are just NOT taxes
It's a common practice in this area.
The "tax bill" frequently includes additional fees such as those for trash pickup or recycling costs. One local community has even added a "stormwater fee." For vehicle bills, the "tax bill" will also include a fixed fee for city and/or county registrations, several of which are now a fixed $30/year fee. (In olden days you also had to buy a city license tag, then replaced by a city windshield decal, now replaced by a fee on the "tax bill.") Of course, the politicians are also crafty by being able to say such things as "But, we did NOT raise your taxes!!"
The IRS rules for deducting "taxes" have always been quite specific: The only thing that can be called a "tax," and therefore constitutes a valid deduction, is something based on the ad valorem tax rate for the property.
Yes, some clients may "get perturbed," and it may require a bit of extra work to view the actual tax bill (such as when the mortage company pays from an escrow account), but them's the rules!!
FE
Comment
-
Fees on Property tax bill
If a client gives me a property tax bill with fees, I don't deduct the fees. However, if the client fills out an organizer, or some other summary of their income tax data, they give me a figure that says property taxes. I take it in good faith, that it is property taxes. In WI, it is widespread of municipalities having vs not having fees on the tax bill. Just like many other things, it is not my job to audit the figures given to me by the client.
Comment
-
There is a need for obtaining the facts
Originally posted by Traveling EA View PostIf a client gives me a property tax bill with fees, I don't deduct the fees. However, if the client fills out an organizer, or some other summary of their income tax data, they give me a figure that says property taxes. I take it in good faith, that it is property taxes. In WI, it is widespread of municipalities having vs not having fees on the tax bill. Just like many other things, it is not my job to audit the figures given to me by the client.
While I agree it is "not my job" to audit the client, I do feel a certain professional responsiblity exists for me to determine the relevant facts.
Just curious: What do you do if a client writes in an organizer he gave $500 to the church? (And the underlying facts are $200 in cash, a box of clothes worth $250, and $50 paid for a Christmas tree at the church bazaar.) And what about those $1500 of medical insurance premiums he paid through his employer? (But they were really pre-tax.)
There is a significant difference between interrogating/auditing a client, and demonstrating a need to obtain the relevant facts in order to prepare a proper return. It would be my opinion that most clients do not generally understand many of the subtleties of the tax laws (that's why they pay us!) and to blindly rely on certain information entered on a general purpose organizer could present potential problems for both the client and myself.
Just my 2¢ worth.
FE
Comment
-
fees
Originally posted by FEDUKE404 View PostInteresting approach to things, since a professional tax preparer should have knowledge of and adhere to IRS regulations while providing a service.
While I agree it is "not my job" to audit the client, I do feel a certain professional responsiblity exists for me to determine the relevant facts.
Just curious: What do you do if a client writes in an organizer he gave $500 to the church? (And the underlying facts are $200 in cash, a box of clothes worth $250, and $50 paid for a Christmas tree at the church bazaar.) And what about those $1500 of medical insurance premiums he paid through his employer? (But they were really pre-tax.)
There is a significant difference between interrogating/auditing a client, and demonstrating a need to obtain the relevant facts in order to prepare a proper return. It would be my opinion that most clients do not generally understand many of the subtleties of the tax laws (that's why they pay us!) and to blindly rely on certain information entered on a general purpose organizer could present potential problems for both the client and myself.
Just my 2¢ worth.
FE
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment