Well, not exactly
Dude, the health insurance was only a (poor) example of the logic behind the inherent issue here of "necessary" versus "required."
Based on the logic expressed here, virtually every college student should just go out and buy a new top-of-the line computer at time of matriculation, and then write it off on his/her taxes, because it is "required." Color me wrong if you wish, but I just don't think that is the underlying intent of the law.
(OK...here's another example...I'll try better): When computers were first appearing for use of the masses, many employees wanted to deduct their own very expensive computers as business expenses to "help them in their job" or whatever. At some point the IRS said "wait a minute!" and then added a similar phrase for employees/computers that a computer could only be an employee business deduction if the employer required them to purchase a computer as a part of employment. (I believe the exact verbiage is now along the lines of "for the convenience of the employer and required as a condition of employment.") Sound familiar? And then there were those folks who were "on call" and wanted to write off a portion of their telephone costs (this is pre-cell phone days). Many/most people did it...but the IRS finally said no one (brain surgeon or janitor), under any circumstances, could claim any portion of the regular monthly service fees for the first telephone line into the house. That quickly put an end to those deductions. I expect at some point a similar restriction on "business" cell phone usage.
And so it goes. I've got too much work to do these days to beat this matter to a further pulp. I'll check in to see what other TTB readers may add.
FE
Originally posted by mactoolsix
View Post
Based on the logic expressed here, virtually every college student should just go out and buy a new top-of-the line computer at time of matriculation, and then write it off on his/her taxes, because it is "required." Color me wrong if you wish, but I just don't think that is the underlying intent of the law.
(OK...here's another example...I'll try better): When computers were first appearing for use of the masses, many employees wanted to deduct their own very expensive computers as business expenses to "help them in their job" or whatever. At some point the IRS said "wait a minute!" and then added a similar phrase for employees/computers that a computer could only be an employee business deduction if the employer required them to purchase a computer as a part of employment. (I believe the exact verbiage is now along the lines of "for the convenience of the employer and required as a condition of employment.") Sound familiar? And then there were those folks who were "on call" and wanted to write off a portion of their telephone costs (this is pre-cell phone days). Many/most people did it...but the IRS finally said no one (brain surgeon or janitor), under any circumstances, could claim any portion of the regular monthly service fees for the first telephone line into the house. That quickly put an end to those deductions. I expect at some point a similar restriction on "business" cell phone usage.
And so it goes. I've got too much work to do these days to beat this matter to a further pulp. I'll check in to see what other TTB readers may add.
FE
Comment