A client borrowed against his main home to buy a 2nd home. Is there any way he can treat this as anything other than equity debt? I think not, but suggestions are welcome.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Equity used to buy 2nd home
Collapse
X
-
Why a Second Home?
If the 2nd home is just a second (and not primary) residence, I think this is treated just like any other second mortgage, limited to the interest on $100,000 on Schedule A.
If the 2nd home is to be used as rental property, there may be some relief -- but I'm not positive the $100,000 limit is lifted. Clearly if the money trail of the loan is for a rental house, the interest may be deducted on Schedule E, possibly without limit.
However, assume the rental property becomes victim to the passive rules and a loss must be suspended via Form 8582. In that case, it might make better sense to not deduct the interest on Sch E, but on Sch A instead. That might convert a Sch E loss into a profit, avoid the passive trap and 8582, and then get the full benefit of the interest deduction on Sch A.
I believe home equity loans can be deducted where the funds are used (Sch C, F, E), but the taxpayer always has the option of trumping these options by deducting instead on Sch A.
-
Originally posted by Snaggletooth View PostHowever, assume the rental property becomes victim to the passive rules and a loss must be suspended via Form 8582. In that case, it might make better sense to not deduct the interest on Sch E, but on Sch A instead. That might convert a Sch E loss into a profit, avoid the passive trap and 8582, and then get the full benefit of the interest deduction on Sch A. I believe home equity loans can be deducted where the funds are used (Sch C, F, E), but the taxpayer always has the option of trumping these options by deducting instead on Sch A.
Comment
-
Rental interest on Sch A
If you deduct rental expense (interest) on Schedule A, you are deductiong it in the wrong place, and should be able to do it correctly in the future and deduct it on Schedule E.
It may or may not be any tax effect that would warrant filing an amended return for the years it was done incorrectly. I see no point in an amended return that would not change the tax, but, I, personally, do file amended returns sometimes with no change in tax to get the record straight.
Comment
-
Who said anything about rental?
Since Schedule A mortgage interest must be on a loan secured by the property. my take is that since this loan was secured by the principal home, it remains an equity loan on the principal home. In particular, it cannot be treated as acquisition debt on the second home. Am I right? IMHO it was a very poor idea for the taxpayer to go about it this way, since he is subject to AMT and therefore gets no interest deduction at all on equity debt.Evan Appelman, EA
Comment
-
Prior Treatment
Originally posted by Burke View PostBut I was under the opinion, that once the election is made to deduct it elsewhere and it is traced to that property use, you could not switch back and forth. If anyone has a cite, let me know.
Since I don't have a cite, would love for someone to address this with authoritative information. "Previous Discussions on this forum" itself is not as good as a cite, obviously.
Comment
-
Dave Fogel has an article on this (although it has to do with a Sched C)
see http://www.fogelcpa.com/Documents/CS...EquityDebt.pdf
Then also found thisThe QRI dollar limits on deductions prescribed under Sec. 163(h)(3)(B)(ii) and (C)(i) bar taxpayers from deducting excess interest payments. QRI included in itemized deductions Itemized Deduction
A deduction from a taxpayer's taxable adjusted gross income that is made up of deductions for money spent on certain goods and services throughout the year. also may be limited in the case of high-income taxpayers. There are certain circumstances in which home-equity debt proceeds could be used to allow interest to be deductible under other Code provisions. Temp. Regs. Sec. 1.163-10T(o)(5) provides that a taxpayer may elect to treat home-equity debt as not secured by a residence.
Election
By making tiffs election, the taxpayer frees the debt from the QRI dollar limit, making it available for another interest deduction Interest deduction
An interest expense, such as interest on a margin account, that is allowed as a deduction for tax purposes. , if applicable. Thus, if interest is deductible regardless of whether it is QRI, electing out of QRI treatment preserves the deduction for interest on other debts deductible only if it is QRI. For purposes of Temp. Regs. Sec. 1.16310T(o)(5), a taxpayer may elect to treat any debt secured by a qualified residence as not secured by such residence.
The election is effective for the tax year for which made and for all subsequent tax years, unless revoked with IRS consent. While deducting the interest on the appropriate forms and/or lines is sufficient under the regulations to perfect the election, taxpayers are advised to make the election in a separate statement attached to the return.
Comment
-
Burke is Correct
Thanks Sandy. Looks like Burke is correct.
1. Taxpayer has choice of using the interest to follow the purpose of the proceeds (C, F, E whatever) and if there is such a use, then it is freed of all typical HELOC/2nd mortgage restrictions.
2. Taxpayer can choose to deduct on Sch A regardless of the purpose, but invokes all the restrictions.
3. After choosing among the above options, taxpayer CANNOT go back and forth having established character of the interest.
If, as Appleman says, it is just a second home and not being used for anything except a second home, it is Sch A stuff and the restrictions apply.
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment