Using the support worksheet, we can arrive at the conclusion that we have a 19 y.o. student with cash inflow from wages and his own student loans, who provides more than half his own support. He lives with Mom, but will claim his own personal exemption. Borrowed amounts and earned income both count as the student's funds.
Using the Form 8863 instructions, and concerning the refundable portion of the AOC, the requirement is that the EARNED income (wages) be more than half the support, with no mention of borrowed funds entering the equation.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i8863.pdf & TTB 12-3
Therefore, the loan proceeds are disregarded, and if the wages alone aren't sufficient to get over the 50%-of-support mark, no refundable AOC to the (otherwise self-supporting) student.
Do you read the rule this way?
BTW- Nice refundable AOC Q & A in the 8863 instructions this year, pp. 4-5.
Using the Form 8863 instructions, and concerning the refundable portion of the AOC, the requirement is that the EARNED income (wages) be more than half the support, with no mention of borrowed funds entering the equation.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i8863.pdf & TTB 12-3
Therefore, the loan proceeds are disregarded, and if the wages alone aren't sufficient to get over the 50%-of-support mark, no refundable AOC to the (otherwise self-supporting) student.
Do you read the rule this way?
BTW- Nice refundable AOC Q & A in the 8863 instructions this year, pp. 4-5.
Comment