I am calling this an "eternal question" because I keep finding two alternate teachings on the subject.
For an S corporation, an owner is not allowed to increase loan basis by guaranteeing a loan. He may, however, increase loan basis by making a loan to the corporation himself[herself].
The conflict is whether and when loan basis is added to stock basis. I was taught (and properly I think) years ago
that a LOSS could not be deducted beyond stock basis. Period. However, if there was additional LOAN BASIS, the shareholder could avoid being taxed if a DISTRIBUTION was made, so long as loan basis was not exceeded. But now I read in an NATP article and also at a seminar that loan basis and stock basis can be added together for purposes of deducting a loss. These people are smarter than I but not sure smarter than those who taught me earlier.
Desperate owns 100% of an S corp, that he started with $20,000 in capital stock. During the year he also loaned
the corporation $10,000. During the first year, the corporation has a loss of $22,000, and Desperate has taken an
additional distribution of $9000.
Which of the following are true?
a) [my belief] Desperate may deduct a loss of $20,000 but does not have to show gain on the $9000 distribution.
He has a suspended loss of $2000 and only $1000 of loan basis left. Stock basis and loan basis are tracked
separately.
b) Desperate may deduct a loss of $22,000 and does not have to show gain on the $9000 distribution.
c) Desperate may deduct a loss of $22,000 but must show gain on the distribution to the extent of $1000. Stock
basis and loan basis are added together interchangeably, and he has overdrawn the total by $1000.
Any takers?
For an S corporation, an owner is not allowed to increase loan basis by guaranteeing a loan. He may, however, increase loan basis by making a loan to the corporation himself[herself].
The conflict is whether and when loan basis is added to stock basis. I was taught (and properly I think) years ago
that a LOSS could not be deducted beyond stock basis. Period. However, if there was additional LOAN BASIS, the shareholder could avoid being taxed if a DISTRIBUTION was made, so long as loan basis was not exceeded. But now I read in an NATP article and also at a seminar that loan basis and stock basis can be added together for purposes of deducting a loss. These people are smarter than I but not sure smarter than those who taught me earlier.
Desperate owns 100% of an S corp, that he started with $20,000 in capital stock. During the year he also loaned
the corporation $10,000. During the first year, the corporation has a loss of $22,000, and Desperate has taken an
additional distribution of $9000.
Which of the following are true?
a) [my belief] Desperate may deduct a loss of $20,000 but does not have to show gain on the $9000 distribution.
He has a suspended loss of $2000 and only $1000 of loan basis left. Stock basis and loan basis are tracked
separately.
b) Desperate may deduct a loss of $22,000 and does not have to show gain on the $9000 distribution.
c) Desperate may deduct a loss of $22,000 but must show gain on the distribution to the extent of $1000. Stock
basis and loan basis are added together interchangeably, and he has overdrawn the total by $1000.
Any takers?
Comment