Under the old rules, we could, by default, create a payment arrangement to anyone who owed less than $25,000. We could divide their balance by 60 months (5 years) to arrive at the payment.
Under the new rules, the balance due can be up to $50,000 with the payment arrived at by dividing the balance due by 72 months (6 years).
Here is my question. If we divide the balance due by 72 months, then at the end of the 6 years there would still be the interest and/or penalties that accumulated over that 6 years.
I have heard from multiple sources that as long as those payments are made as scheduled, the account will be considered "Paid in full" at the end of the 6 years. Unfortunately, I cannot find anything in writing to support this. Can someone tell me if they have a cite for this? THANKS!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the new rules, the balance due can be up to $50,000 with the payment arrived at by dividing the balance due by 72 months (6 years).
Here is my question. If we divide the balance due by 72 months, then at the end of the 6 years there would still be the interest and/or penalties that accumulated over that 6 years.
I have heard from multiple sources that as long as those payments are made as scheduled, the account will be considered "Paid in full" at the end of the 6 years. Unfortunately, I cannot find anything in writing to support this. Can someone tell me if they have a cite for this? THANKS!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment