That is the question...
You make a valid point. Without doing any number-crunching, a person who is already itemizing and already above the 7.5% (soon to be 10%?) medical shearing would likely see minimal benefit by going the SEHI adjustment to income route. For folks in that position, the risk/reward ratio might be even narrower for those who are....ahem....bending the rules to take the SEHI adjustment in the first place.
The picture becomes much clearer when the person neither itemizes via Sch A, nor does not have sufficient medical expenses above the floor amount.
One issue might come into play: What about things that are related to AGI (or even MAGI) limitations? There are many, and for those reasons alone lowering the AGI/MAGI might prove to be of tax benefits separate from anything associated with Sch A and/or itemized medical deductions. It's too late for my brain to ponder those scenarios....but they could very well exist.
FE
Originally posted by JohnH
View Post
The picture becomes much clearer when the person neither itemizes via Sch A, nor does not have sufficient medical expenses above the floor amount.
One issue might come into play: What about things that are related to AGI (or even MAGI) limitations? There are many, and for those reasons alone lowering the AGI/MAGI might prove to be of tax benefits separate from anything associated with Sch A and/or itemized medical deductions. It's too late for my brain to ponder those scenarios....but they could very well exist.
FE
Comment