Here is either an observation and/or question on a Form 1065 Partnership Return
2011 Form 1065 rejected that a "DIY" tried to complete thru Turbo Tax ---- so restating with corrections to file.
While restating - observation - Assets purchased entered as Sect 179 - and when K-1s were completed - nothing passed through to Partner's K-1 form - No notation of Sect 179 per Partner K-1 form ( I think there should have been at least a notation on K-1 - Line 12 with maybe a schedule from Turbo Tax)
When I re-state and enter into my Software - I just let the system automatically elect the Special Allowance for 2011 - all of the "allowed" transfers" to the Partner K-1 forms and all is incorporated reflected in K-1 Line - Ordinary business inc.(Loss.)
Observation is that Special Allowance default becomes Ordinary business loss/income, but if opt out of Special Allowance and elect Sect 179 - it is not reflected in Line 1 of the K-1 form and the Sect 179 would be reflected on Line 12 of the Partner's K-1 form.
Hmm
Seems like the Special Allowance could be a better option?
What are the "pitfalls" of claiming Special Allowance versus Sect 179?
Thanks
Sandy
2011 Form 1065 rejected that a "DIY" tried to complete thru Turbo Tax ---- so restating with corrections to file.
While restating - observation - Assets purchased entered as Sect 179 - and when K-1s were completed - nothing passed through to Partner's K-1 form - No notation of Sect 179 per Partner K-1 form ( I think there should have been at least a notation on K-1 - Line 12 with maybe a schedule from Turbo Tax)
When I re-state and enter into my Software - I just let the system automatically elect the Special Allowance for 2011 - all of the "allowed" transfers" to the Partner K-1 forms and all is incorporated reflected in K-1 Line - Ordinary business inc.(Loss.)
Observation is that Special Allowance default becomes Ordinary business loss/income, but if opt out of Special Allowance and elect Sect 179 - it is not reflected in Line 1 of the K-1 form and the Sect 179 would be reflected on Line 12 of the Partner's K-1 form.
Hmm
Seems like the Special Allowance could be a better option?
What are the "pitfalls" of claiming Special Allowance versus Sect 179?
Thanks
Sandy
Comment