The Tax Flounder

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nashville
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 1129

    #1

    The Tax Flounder

    More and more states are cutting back on their phone staff (except for collections), answering relevant correspondence, ignoring taxpayer inquiries, etc.

    Here is our chance to sound off about them. Let's create an infamous award for a combination of aggression, lack of responsiveness, inefficiency, etc. and call it the TaxFlounder.

    Only one rule: Cannot be your home state (as bad as it may be). This assures a more broad based and more objective opinion. Preferably the TaxFlounder Award should come from those of us who have some experience with multi-state tax filing.

    My TaxFlounder award can be split between two states - Virginia and Pennsylvania. I really don't know which is worse. Cannot get anyone to help you there. After failing in Pennsylvania to reach anyone, I decided to call the collection division. Surely someone there would be answering the phones.

    Sure enough, I did get to talk with someone anxious to collect on delinquent accounts. When she found out I just needed help, she said "Everyone calls me because they can't get anyone else to answer the phone, and my boss told me I can't help you or put you through to anyone else in the department."
  • Lion
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2005
    • 4698

    #2
    Ny

    I nominate NY, for more reasons that I can list.

    Comment

    • DaveO
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2005
      • 1453

      #3
      Iowa has to be among the worst. I had a new client come in, a multi-year non-filer. The state of Iowa had levied $8000 out of his account over what turned out to be a $500 tax bill. Even lacking the returns there was no reasonable way he could have had a state liability anywhere near $8000.
      In other words, a democratic government is the only one in which those who vote for a tax can escape the obligation to pay it.
      Alexis de Tocqueville

      Comment

      • Golden Rocket
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2007
        • 519

        #4
        Not a Tax Rate

        First bad thing I've heard about Iowa, but I guess any state can be bad if they cut their telephone support and hire incompetent people.

        By the way, this should not be intended as a commentary about horrible tax rates in the various states, but rather an evaluation as to how well or poorly a state does in meeting its good faith attempts by taxpayers and preparers to deal with problems.

        For example, I'm told Minnesota has very stiff rates for a midwestern state plus they are very aggressive. However, I'm also told that they have a decent, reasonably educated and helpful staff to unravel the mess once things get screwed up. Maybe I'm giving them too much credit, but if this be true, MN would not be on this blacklist.
        Last edited by Golden Rocket; 06-07-2012, 02:36 PM.

        Comment

        • Koss
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2005
          • 2256

          #5
          Worst State?

          What about Florida?

          There can't possibly be anything worse.

          They don't have an income tax office open to the public.

          They don't publish a phone number.

          They don't even have a staff!

          [LMAO]

          BMK
          Burton M. Koss
          koss@usakoss.net

          ____________________________________
          The map is not the territory...
          and the instruction book is not the process.

          Comment

          • Lion
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2005
            • 4698

            #6
            My kids live in PA, so I have to agree that PA deserves a nomination -- along with NY !! I have to fax in their NYNR returns to PA before PA will process their refunds on their e-filed PA returns; and their fax line is always busy. They have bizarre property and occupational taxes that are paid locally. For my kids, that means pay at Mrs. Wank's house on Tuesdays and Thursdays during two weeks in the afternoons but not at 3 p.m. when the school bus arrives! Very strange.

            And, IL. I have some farmland that had been my grandfather's since the 1800s. IL has a tax rate of 3%, so seems like it should be nothing on my tiny income from corn and soy beans. But, IL's 3% is on the very first dollar you earn, so is actually a higher effective rate than CT's recent rate increases to 6% and more.

            Comment

            • spanel
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2008
              • 845

              #7
              Originally posted by Lion
              My kids live in PA, so I have to agree that PA deserves a nomination -- along with NY !! I have to fax in their NYNR returns to PA before PA will process their refunds on their e-filed PA returns; and their fax line is always busy. They have bizarre property and occupational taxes that are paid locally. For my kids, that means pay at Mrs. Wank's house on Tuesdays and Thursdays during two weeks in the afternoons but not at 3 p.m. when the school bus arrives! Very strange.

              And, IL. I have some farmland that had been my grandfather's since the 1800s. IL has a tax rate of 3%, so seems like it should be nothing on my tiny income from corn and soy beans. But, IL's 3% is on the very first dollar you earn, so is actually a higher effective rate than CT's recent rate increases to 6% and more.
              Better double check your return...IL changed to 5% for 2011

              Chris

              Comment

              • Lion
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2005
                • 4698

                #8
                Good point. I'm on extension. Prepare my own return after all my paying clients. Glad I always send in a generous amount with my IL extension. My IL property bills just arrived, and they're higher also.

                Comment

                Working...