The tax code is full of references to fair market value. Literally dozens of them, such as FMV vs acquisition cost, FMV of collateral for cancelled debt, FMV for measurement of a gift, etc. etc. etc.
Many properties today (especially real estate) have FMVs in the six-or-seven digits.
I have never heard any mention in the code, instructions, reference books, etc. of lowering the FMV for selling expense. And appraisers always give their appraisal based on contract value rather than "net" value to the seller after paying real estate agent fees, closing costs, or other selling costs. Some instruction books present elaborate examples of how FMV affects a particular calculation, but realtor's commissions, selling expenses etc are NEVER mentioned.
Should FMV be lowered to compensate for expenses which sellers can be expected to incur??
Many properties today (especially real estate) have FMVs in the six-or-seven digits.
I have never heard any mention in the code, instructions, reference books, etc. of lowering the FMV for selling expense. And appraisers always give their appraisal based on contract value rather than "net" value to the seller after paying real estate agent fees, closing costs, or other selling costs. Some instruction books present elaborate examples of how FMV affects a particular calculation, but realtor's commissions, selling expenses etc are NEVER mentioned.
Should FMV be lowered to compensate for expenses which sellers can be expected to incur??
Comment