I think I have no way of helping this client but want to make sure, any feedback would be appreciated on this one.
It's a cash-out refi / HELOC problem. I have a client that just short sold her primary residence, she had put a large amount of cash into the home. She was not insolvent. Her basis was 720K and the sale price was 370K, the debt forgiven was 121k. Her basis easily exceeds both the sale price and leftover debt forgiven and this is because she made a huge down payment and made large improvements all with cash. The problem is later on, after making those improvements she refi'ed and pulled out 10K, then got a HELOC for 110k for her business. If she had only paid for the improvements with the heloc and paid for the business stuff cash then none of this debt would be taxable, but she did it in the other order.
Is it possible to somehow classify the this debt as acquisition debt so we can save her from paying taxes on it? Can we make some crazy argument like the funds would have been used for improvements if her cash hadn't been depleted on the improvements and money is fungible so it's the same as acquisition debt? That's probably going way out on a limb so I think she's in trouble.
It's a cash-out refi / HELOC problem. I have a client that just short sold her primary residence, she had put a large amount of cash into the home. She was not insolvent. Her basis was 720K and the sale price was 370K, the debt forgiven was 121k. Her basis easily exceeds both the sale price and leftover debt forgiven and this is because she made a huge down payment and made large improvements all with cash. The problem is later on, after making those improvements she refi'ed and pulled out 10K, then got a HELOC for 110k for her business. If she had only paid for the improvements with the heloc and paid for the business stuff cash then none of this debt would be taxable, but she did it in the other order.
Is it possible to somehow classify the this debt as acquisition debt so we can save her from paying taxes on it? Can we make some crazy argument like the funds would have been used for improvements if her cash hadn't been depleted on the improvements and money is fungible so it's the same as acquisition debt? That's probably going way out on a limb so I think she's in trouble.
Comment