Originally posted by JenMO
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Client Copy of the Return
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Gretel View PostI didn't understand this literally. My software prints my company name on the tax return. I always understood it to not have blanks where the preparer information goes.
Comment
-
Computer generated signature
is the same as hand signature for the tax preparer and ERO. The pin you enter for a pin protected signature is also the official signature for you and your client. You never have to sign in ink, as far as I can tell.
I was always taught that you should only sign the official filing copy of a return. You never know what might get changed on paper copies after they leave your desk. Althought the software prints my name automatically on the forms , so I guess I am in a way.AJ, EA
Comment
-
Originally posted by Koss View PostIn a different thread, taxea wrote:
I agree that the client copy does not need to be signed by the preparer.
But they may have the right to a signed copy of Form 8879. I'd have to look that one up.
Student loan servicers and financial aid officers routinely require students and their parents to produce a signed copy of their tax return, and some have been known to insist that they produce a copy that is also signed by the preparer. I don't know whether they have any statutory authority to make such demands. But the reality is that they do. I'd love to hear about a case where the student complies by signing the tax form himself, but then says that he can't obtain the preaprer's signature because the preparer is out of business, or deceased...
I have seen some financial aid guidelines that are finally staggering into the 21st century, where it says that you can submit a signed copy of the e-file authorization, or declaration, or whatever it is called. That's Form 8879. And of course they still want the entire return, but they are acknowledging that the signatures may show up somewhere other than at the bottom of Form 1040.
But if you do a Google search, you'll find hundreds of references on financial aid websites at universities, stating that the student must submit a signed copy of their tax return.
They will accept signed documents that are marked with a "copy" stamp, or a watermark, which is available in almost all professional software now. So they do seem to recognize a distinction between a copy and an original...
BMK
I
I am not willing to sign a copy of a filed return because I can not vouch for a return that may be manipulated by the client. If they want an accurate filed return then they can request a transcript from the IRS.Believe nothing you have not personally researched and verified.
Comment
-
Paid Preparer's name printed in signature box?
Originally posted by BP. View Post"Must sign" is one of the listed requirements here:
http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/...120129,00.html
I am looking at a new 2011 client for which her CPA who preparered her 2010 tax return printed his name in the Preparer's Signature box thus violating #8. The IRS link above is dated Jan 2011.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AZ-Tax View PostSo what about those tax returns for which the paid preparer "typed" there name in the "preparer's signature" box?
I am looking at a new 2011 client for which her CPA who preparered her 2010 tax return printed his name in the Preparer's Signature box thus violating #8. The IRS link above is dated Jan 2011.
Comment
-
No violation
Again, BP, this is not a violation because--
- the signature requirement is only applicable to the original return, and
- you are not looking at the original return.
I concede that clients and the media may not recognize this subtle point. But the fact is that there are two separate rules. One rule says you have to sign the tax return. The other rule says you have to give the client a copy of the return. It does not follow that the copy must be signed.
I will reluctantly concede that one could argue that the copy you give to the client is somehow not a complete and accurate copy if it does not include the signatures that appear on the original.
But on that reasoning, you would be required to get the taxpayer's signature (and even the spouse) before making a copy, in order to make sure that the copy has all the signatures that appear on the original.
Furthermore, if the return is e-filed, the "signatures that appear on the original" are not handwritten signatures. They are PINs.
The copy simply does not have to be signed. If it makes the tax pro or the client feel better, then there's no harm. But I do think it should be clearly marked as a COPY, so that some bonehead doesn't mail it in after the return has been e-filed.
BMKLast edited by Koss; 02-10-2012, 02:34 PM.Burton M. Koss
koss@usakoss.net
____________________________________
The map is not the territory...
and the instruction book is not the process.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Koss View PostI concede that clients and the media may not recognize this subtle point. But the fact is that there are [i]two separate rules[/i.] One rule says you have to sign the tax return. The other rule says you have to give the client a copy of the return. It does not follow that the copy must be signed.
Which is not to criticize experienced people who get this wrong. Usually it's not the lack of logic skills, but rather the lack of time that causes these misinterpretations in practice. And lack of time is pandemic.Last edited by Gary2; 02-10-2012, 08:09 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BP. View Post"Must sign" is one of the listed requirements here:
http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/...120129,00.htmlBelieve nothing you have not personally researched and verified.
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment